Compare the debug key with the production key to make sure that they are not the same.
Public Key Re-Use for Signing both Debug and Production Code
This vulnerability occurs when the same cryptographic key is used to sign both development/debug software builds and final production releases. This insecure practice allows debug versions, which…
What is CWE-1291?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1291
Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable Other
This example illustrates the danger of using the same public key for debug and production.
Suppose the product design requires frugality of silicon real estate. Assume that originally the architecture allows just enough storage for two 2048-bit RSA keys in the fuse: one to be used for debug and the other for production. However, in the meantime, a business decision is taken to make the security future-proof beyond 2030, which means the architecture needs to use the NIST-recommended 3072-bit keys instead of the originally-planned 2048-bit keys. This means that, at most, one key can be fully stored in the fuses, not two. So the product design team decides to use the same public key for debug and production. Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1291
- Implementation Use different keys for Production and Debug
How to detect CWE-1291
Compare the debug key with the production key to make sure that they are not the same.
Plexicus erkennt CWE-1291 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-1291?
This vulnerability occurs when the same cryptographic key is used to sign both development/debug software builds and final production releases. This insecure practice allows debug versions, which often contain powerful diagnostic features, to be validated and run on live production systems.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-1291?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1291 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.
Wie kann ich CWE-1291 verhindern?
Use different keys for Production and Debug
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1291?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1291 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1291?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1291.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1291
Protection Mechanism Failure
This weakness occurs when software either lacks a necessary security control, implements one that is too weak, or fails to activate an…
Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations in Automated Recognition Mechanism
This vulnerability occurs when a system uses automated AI or machine learning to classify complex inputs like images, audio, or text, but…
Semiconductor Defects in Hardware Logic with Security-Sensitive Implications
A security-critical hardware component contains physical flaws in its semiconductor material, which can cause it to malfunction and…
Incorrect Selection of Fuse Values
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware security fuse is incorrectly programmed to represent a 'secure' state as logic 0 (unblown). An…
Product Released in Non-Release Configuration
This vulnerability occurs when a product ships to customers while still configured with its pre-production or manufacturing settings,…
Missing Protection Against Hardware Reverse Engineering Using Integrated Circuit (IC) Imaging Techniques
This vulnerability occurs when hardware lacks safeguards against physical inspection, allowing attackers to extract sensitive data by…
Missing Support for Security Features in On-chip Fabrics or Buses
This vulnerability occurs when the communication channels (fabrics or buses) within a chip lack built-in or enabled security features,…
Improper Protection against Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EM-FI)
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device lacks sufficient shielding against electromagnetic interference, allowing attackers to…
Missing Immutable Root of Trust in Hardware
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware chip lacks a permanent, unchangeable root of trust. Without this immutable foundation, attackers…
Further reading
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.