CWE-135 Base Draft

Incorrect Calculation of Multi-Byte String Length

This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly measures the length of strings containing multi-byte or wide characters, leading to buffer overflows, data corruption, or crashes.

Definition

What is CWE-135?

This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly measures the length of strings containing multi-byte or wide characters, leading to buffer overflows, data corruption, or crashes.
Many programming languages and systems use multi-byte character encodings (like UTF-8) or wide characters (like UTF-16) where a single logical character can be made of multiple bytes. Standard string length functions (like strlen in C) often count bytes, not characters, which creates a mismatch. When security checks or memory allocations rely on this incorrect count, buffers can be overrun or under-read, creating a critical entry point for attacks. Developers encounter this when handling international text, file paths, or user input without using encoding-aware functions. To prevent it, always use dedicated library functions designed for your specific character encoding (like mbstowcs or wcslen for wide strings) and validate that memory operations account for the maximum possible bytes per character, not just the count of logical units.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-135

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.

  2. 2

    Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.

  3. 3

    Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.

  4. 4

    Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable C

The following example would be exploitable if any of the commented incorrect malloc calls were used.

Verwundbar C 
#include <stdio.h>
  #include <strings.h>
  #include <wchar.h>
  int main() {
  		wchar_t wideString[] = L"The spazzy orange tiger jumped " \
  		"over the tawny jaguar.";
  		wchar_t *newString;
  		printf("Strlen() output: %d\nWcslen() output: %d\n",
  		strlen(wideString), wcslen(wideString));
  		/* Wrong because the number of chars in a string isn't related to its length in bytes //
  		newString = (wchar_t *) malloc(strlen(wideString));
  		*/
  		/* Wrong because wide characters aren't 1 byte long! //
  		newString = (wchar_t *) malloc(wcslen(wideString));
  		*/
  		/* Wrong because wcslen does not include the terminating null */
  		newString = (wchar_t *) malloc(wcslen(wideString) * sizeof(wchar_t));
  		/* correct! */
  		newString = (wchar_t *) malloc((wcslen(wideString) + 1) * sizeof(wchar_t));
  		/* ... */
  }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-135

  • Implementation Always verify the length of the string unit character.
  • Implementation Use length computing functions (e.g. strlen, wcslen, etc.) appropriately with their equivalent type (e.g.: byte, wchar_t, etc.)
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-135

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-135 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Demo anfordern Plexicus kostenlos testen
Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-135?

This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly measures the length of strings containing multi-byte or wide characters, leading to buffer overflows, data corruption, or crashes.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-135?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-135 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++.

Wie kann ich CWE-135 verhindern?

Always verify the length of the string unit character. Use length computing functions (e.g. strlen, wcslen, etc.) appropriately with their equivalent type (e.g.: byte, wchar_t, etc.)

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-135?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-135 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-135?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/135.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-135

CWE-682 Parent

Incorrect Calculation

This vulnerability occurs when software performs a calculation that produces wrong or unexpected results, which are then used to make…

CWE-128 Sibling

Wrap-around Error

A wrap-around error happens when a variable exceeds the maximum value its data type can hold, causing it to unexpectedly reset to a very…

CWE-131 Sibling

Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size

This vulnerability occurs when a program miscalculates the amount of memory needed for a buffer, potentially leading to a buffer overflow…

CWE-1335 Sibling

Incorrect Bitwise Shift of Integer

This vulnerability occurs when a program attempts to shift an integer's bits by an invalid amount—either a negative number or a value…

CWE-1339 Sibling

Insufficient Precision or Accuracy of a Real Number

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a data type or algorithm that cannot accurately represent or calculate the fractional part…

CWE-190 Sibling

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer overflow or wraparound occurs when a calculation produces a numeric result that exceeds the maximum value a variable can hold.…

CWE-191 Sibling

Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound)

Integer underflow occurs when a subtraction operation results in a value smaller than the data type's minimum limit, causing the value to…

CWE-193 Sibling

Off-by-one Error

An off-by-one error occurs when a program incorrectly calculates a boundary, such as a loop counter or array index, by being one unit too…

CWE-369 Sibling

Divide By Zero

A divide-by-zero error occurs when software attempts to perform a division operation where the denominator is zero.

Ressourcen

Further reading

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.

Kostenlos starten Demo buchen