Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.
Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows an attacker to trigger a disproportionate amount of resource consumption—like CPU, memory, or bandwidth—with minimal effort on their part. The…
What is CWE-405?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-405
-
Classic "Smurf" attack, using spoofed ICMP packets to broadcast addresses.
-
Parsing library allows XML bomb
-
Tool creates directories before authenticating user.
-
Python has "quadratic complexity" issue when converting string to int with many digits in unexpected bases
-
server allows ReDOS with crafted User-Agent strings, due to overlapping capture groups that cause excessive backtracking.
-
composite: NTP feature generates large responses (high amplification factor) with spoofed UDP source addresses.
-
Diffie-Hellman (DHE) Key Agreement Protocol allows attackers to send arbitrary numbers that are not public keys, which causes the server to perform expensive, unnecessary computation of modular exponentiation.
-
The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents, which are more computationally expensive than using certain "short exponents" with particular properties.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
This code listens on a port for DNS requests and sends the result to the requesting address.
- 2
This code sends a DNS record to a requesting IP address. UDP allows the source IP address to be easily changed ('spoofed'), thus allowing an attacker to redirect responses to a target, which may be then be overwhelmed by the network traffic.
- 3
This function prints the contents of a specified file requested by a user.
- 4
This code first reads a specified file into memory, then prints the file if the user is authorized to see its contents. The read of the file into memory may be resource intensive and is unnecessary if the user is not allowed to see the file anyway.
- 5
The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.
Vulnerable Python
This code listens on a port for DNS requests and sends the result to the requesting address.
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
sock.bind( (UDP_IP,UDP_PORT) )
while true:
data = sock.recvfrom(1024)
if not data:
break
(requestIP, nameToResolve) = parseUDPpacket(data)
record = resolveName(nameToResolve)
sendResponse(requestIP,record) The DTD and the very brief XML below illustrate what is meant by an XML bomb. The ZERO entity contains one character, the letter A. The choice of entity name ZERO is being used to indicate length equivalent to that exponent on two, that is, the length of ZERO is 2^0. Similarly, ONE refers to ZERO twice, therefore the XML parser will expand ONE to a length of 2, or 2^1. Ultimately, we reach entity THIRTYTWO, which will expand to 2^32 characters in length, or 4 GB, probably consuming far more data than expected.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE MaliciousDTD [
<!ENTITY ZERO "A">
<!ENTITY ONE "&ZERO;&ZERO;">
<!ENTITY TWO "&ONE;&ONE;">
...
<!ENTITY THIRTYTWO "&THIRTYONE;&THIRTYONE;">
]>
<data>&THIRTYTWO;</data> Secure JavaScript
The regular expression has a vulnerable backtracking clause inside (\w+\s?)*$ which can be triggered to cause a Denial of Service by processing particular phrases. To fix the backtracking problem, backtracking is removed with the ?= portion of the expression which changes it to a lookahead and the \2 which prevents the backtracking. The modified example is:
var test_string = "Bad characters: $@#";
var good_pattern = /^((?=(\w+))\2\s?)*$/i;
var result = test_string.search(good_pattern); How to prevent CWE-405
- Architecture and Design An application must make resources available to a client commensurate with the client's access level.
- Architecture and Design An application must, at all times, keep track of allocated resources and meter their usage appropriately.
- System Configuration Consider disabling resource-intensive algorithms on the server side, such as Diffie-Hellman key exchange.
How to detect CWE-405
Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.
Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.
Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.
Plexicus erkennt CWE-405 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-405?
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows an attacker to trigger a disproportionate amount of resource consumption—like CPU, memory, or bandwidth—with minimal effort on their part. The attacker's small input causes a large, inefficient output, creating an unfair 'asymmetric' advantage.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-405?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-405 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific, Client Server.
Wie kann ich CWE-405 verhindern?
An application must make resources available to a client commensurate with the client's access level. An application must, at all times, keep track of allocated resources and meter their usage appropriately.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-405?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-405 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-405?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/405.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-405
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Incorrect Use of Autoboxing and Unboxing for Performance Critical Operations
This weakness occurs when a program relies on automatic boxing and unboxing of primitive types within performance-sensitive code sections,…
Improper Write Handling in Limited-write Non-Volatile Memories
This vulnerability occurs when a system fails to properly manage write operations on memory hardware that has a limited lifespan, such as…
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
This vulnerability occurs when a system allows users or processes to request resources without any built-in caps or rate limits. Think of…
Missing Reference to Active Allocated Resource
This vulnerability occurs when software loses track of a resource it has allocated, like memory or a file handle, preventing the system…
Logging of Excessive Data
This vulnerability occurs when an application records more information than necessary in its logs, making log files difficult to analyze…
Improper Restriction of Power Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when software running on a power-constrained device, like a battery-powered mobile or embedded system, fails to…
Excessive Platform Resource Consumption within a Loop
This vulnerability occurs when a loop contains code that repeatedly consumes critical system resources like file handles, database…
Data Resource Access without Use of Connection Pooling
This weakness occurs when an application creates a new database connection for every request instead of using a managed connection pool.…
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.