Fuzz testing (fuzzing) is a powerful technique for generating large numbers of diverse inputs - either randomly or algorithmically - and dynamically invoking the code with those inputs. Even with random inputs, it is often capable of generating unexpected results such as crashes, memory corruption, or resource consumption. Fuzzing effectively produces repeatable test cases that clearly indicate bugs, which helps developers to diagnose the issues.
Use After Free
Use After Free happens when a program continues to use a pointer to a memory location after that memory has been freed. This can lead to unpredictable behavior, crashes, or security vulnerabilities…
What is CWE-416?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-416
-
Chain: an operating system kernel has insufficent resource locking (CWE-413) leading to a use after free (CWE-416).
-
Chain: two threads in a web browser use the same resource (CWE-366), but one of those threads can destroy the resource before the other has completed (CWE-416).
-
Chain: mobile platform race condition (CWE-362) leading to use-after-free (CWE-416), as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Chain: race condition (CWE-362) leads to use-after-free (CWE-416), as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Use-after-free triggered by closing a connection while data is still being transmitted.
-
Improper allocation for invalid data leads to use-after-free.
-
certificate with a large number of Subject Alternate Names not properly handled in realloc, leading to use-after-free
-
Timers are not disabled when a related object is deleted
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
- 2
The following code illustrates a use after free error:
- 3
When an error occurs, the pointer is immediately freed. However, this pointer is later incorrectly used in the logError function.
Vulnerable C
The following example demonstrates the weakness.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define BUFSIZER1 512
#define BUFSIZER2 ((BUFSIZER1/2) - 8)
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
char *buf1R1;
char *buf2R1;
char *buf2R2;
char *buf3R2;
buf1R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1);
buf2R1 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER1);
free(buf2R1);
buf2R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2);
buf3R2 = (char *) malloc(BUFSIZER2);
strncpy(buf2R1, argv[1], BUFSIZER1-1);
free(buf1R1);
free(buf2R2);
free(buf3R2);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-416
- Architecture and Design Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.
- Implementation When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
How to detect CWE-416
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Plexicus erkennt CWE-416 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-416?
Use After Free happens when a program continues to use a pointer to a memory location after that memory has been freed. This can lead to unpredictable behavior, crashes, or security vulnerabilities because the freed memory may have been reallocated for a different purpose.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-416?
MITRE stuft die Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit als hoch ein — diese Schwachstelle wird aktiv in freier Wildbahn ausgenutzt und sollte priorisiert behoben werden.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-416 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++.
Wie kann ich CWE-416 verhindern?
Choose a language that provides automatic memory management. When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-416?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-416 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-416?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/416.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-416
Expired Pointer Dereference
This vulnerability occurs when a program tries to use a pointer that still points to a memory location that has already been freed or…
Double Free
A double free vulnerability occurs when a program mistakenly calls the 'free()' function twice on the same block of memory.
Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')
This vulnerability occurs when a program copies data from one memory location to another without first verifying that the source data will…
Write-what-where Condition
A write-what-where condition occurs when an attacker can control both the data written and the exact memory location where it's written,…
Further reading
- MITRE — offizielle CWE-416 https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/416.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
- The CLASP Application Security Process https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.