Fuzz testing (fuzzing) is a powerful technique for generating large numbers of diverse inputs - either randomly or algorithmically - and dynamically invoking the code with those inputs. Even with random inputs, it is often capable of generating unexpected results such as crashes, memory corruption, or resource consumption. Fuzzing effectively produces repeatable test cases that clearly indicate bugs, which helps developers to diagnose the issues.
Return of Stack Variable Address
This vulnerability occurs when a function returns a pointer to its own local variable. Since that variable's memory is on the stack, the pointer becomes invalid as soon as the function finishes,…
What is CWE-562?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-562
Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable C
The following function returns a stack address.
char* getName() {
char name[STR_MAX];
fillInName(name);
return name;
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-562
- Testing Use static analysis tools to spot return of the address of a stack variable.
How to detect CWE-562
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Plexicus erkennt CWE-562 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-562?
This vulnerability occurs when a function returns a pointer to its own local variable. Since that variable's memory is on the stack, the pointer becomes invalid as soon as the function finishes, leading to crashes or unpredictable behavior.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-562?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-562 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++.
Wie kann ich CWE-562 verhindern?
Use static analysis tools to spot return of the address of a stack variable.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-562?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-562 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-562?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/562.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-562
Reliance on Undefined, Unspecified, or Implementation-Defined Behavior
This weakness occurs when software depends on specific behaviors of an API, data structure, or system component that are not formally…
Insecure Automated Optimizations
This vulnerability occurs when software uses automated tools to optimize code for performance or efficiency, but those optimizations…
Reliance on Machine-Dependent Data Representation
This weakness occurs when software directly depends on how a specific machine, processor, or operating system represents data in memory.…
Use of Platform-Dependent Third Party Components
This weakness occurs when software depends on third-party libraries or components that behave differently or lack support across various…
Insufficient Encapsulation of Machine-Dependent Functionality
This weakness occurs when an application relies on hardware-specific or platform-dependent features but fails to isolate that code from…
Use of Function with Inconsistent Implementations
This vulnerability occurs when code relies on a function whose behavior changes across different operating systems or versions, leading to…
Assignment of a Fixed Address to a Pointer
This vulnerability occurs when code explicitly assigns a hardcoded memory address to a pointer, instead of using a dynamic or null value.
Attempt to Access Child of a Non-structure Pointer
This vulnerability occurs when code incorrectly treats a pointer to a basic data type (like an integer) as if it points to a structured…
Operation on a Resource after Expiration or Release
This vulnerability occurs when a program continues to use a resource—like memory, a file handle, or a network connection—after it has been…
Further reading
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.