Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource based on user-controlled input, but fails to properly validate or restrict where those requests are sent.…
What is CWE-918?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-918
-
SSRF in LLM application development framework because the URL retriever allows connections to local addresses using a crafted Location header
-
Chain: LLM integration framework has prompt injection (CWE-1427) that allows an attacker to force the service to retrieve data from an arbitrary URL, essentially providing SSRF (CWE-918) and potentially injecting content into downstream tasks.
-
Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in mail server, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Server Side Request Forgery in cloud platform, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Chain: incorrect validation of intended decimal-based IP address format (CWE-1286) enables parsing of octal or hexadecimal formats (CWE-1389), allowing bypass of an SSRF protection mechanism (CWE-918).
-
Web server allows attackers to request a URL from another server, including other ports, which allows proxied scanning.
-
CGI script accepts and retrieves incoming URLs.
-
Web-based mail program allows internal network scanning using a modified POP3 port number.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE hat kein Codebeispiel für diese CWE veröffentlicht. Das untenstehende Muster ist illustrativ — kanonische Referenzen findest du unter Ressourcen.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-918
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-918
Plexicus erkennt CWE-918 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-918?
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource based on user-controlled input, but fails to properly validate or restrict where those requests are sent. This allows an attacker to trick the server into making unauthorized connections to internal systems or external domains.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-918?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-918 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: AI/ML, Web Server.
Wie kann ich CWE-918 verhindern?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-918?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-918 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-918?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-918
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')
A confused deputy vulnerability occurs when a system receives a request from a client and forwards it to an external destination without…
Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly control whether its pages can be embedded within frames or UI layers…
Further reading
- MITRE — offizielle CWE-918 https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
- SSRF vs. Business-critical applications: XXE tunneling in SAP https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Polyakov/BH_US_12_Polyakov_SSRF_Business_Slides.pdf
- SSRF vs. Business-critical Applications. Part 1: XXE Tunnelling in SAP NetWeaver http://erpscan.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/SSRF-vs-Businness-critical-applications-whitepaper.pdf
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 1 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-1/
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 2 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-2/
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 3 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-3/
- SSRF attacks and sockets: smorgasbord of vulnerabilities https://www.slideshare.net/DefconRussia/vorontsov-golovko-ssrf-attacks-and-sockets-smorgasbord-of-vulnerabilities
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.