CWE-698 Base Incomplete

Execution After Redirect (EAR)

Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run server-side code, potentially performing unintended actions.

Definition

What is CWE-698?

Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run server-side code, potentially performing unintended actions.
This vulnerability happens because the server-side logic doesn't properly halt execution after issuing a redirect command (like an HTTP 302 or 303 status). Instead of stopping, the application proceeds to execute the remaining code in the script or function. This leftover code can perform dangerous operations like updating databases, processing payments, or changing user sessions, even though the user is already being sent to a new page. From a security perspective, EAR is dangerous because an attacker can often interrupt or ignore the redirect. By using tools or crafting requests, they can let the redirect happen in the browser while still receiving and acting upon the results of the unauthorized server-side execution. To prevent this, developers must ensure the application flow terminates immediately after sending a redirect, typically by using explicit return or exit statements in the code.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-698

  • Execution-after-redirect allows access to application configuration details.

  • chain: library file sends a redirect if it is directly requested but continues to execute, allowing remote file inclusion and path traversal.

  • Remote attackers can obtain access to administrator functionality through EAR.

  • Remote attackers can obtain access to administrator functionality through EAR.

  • Bypass of authentication step through EAR.

  • Chain: Execution after redirect triggers eval injection.

  • chain: execution after redirect allows non-administrator to perform static code injection.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.

  2. 2

    Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.

  3. 3

    Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.

  4. 4

    Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable PHP

This code queries a server and displays its status when a request comes from an authorized IP address.

Verwundbar PHP
$requestingIP = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
  if(!in_array($requestingIP,$ipAllowList)){
  	echo "You are not authorized to view this page";
  	http_redirect($errorPageURL);
  }
  $status = getServerStatus();
  echo $status;
```
...*
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-698

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-698

Black Box

This issue might not be detected if testing is performed using a web browser, because the browser might obey the redirect and move the user to a different page before the application has produced outputs that indicate something is amiss.

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-698 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-698?

Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run server-side code, potentially performing unintended actions.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-698?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-698 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-698 verhindern?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-698?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-698 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-698?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/698.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-698

CWE-705 Parent

Incorrect Control Flow Scoping

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to return execution to the correct point in the code after finishing a specific operation…

CWE-248 Sibling

Uncaught Exception

This vulnerability occurs when a function throws an error or exception, but the calling code does not have a proper handler to catch and…

CWE-382 Sibling

J2EE Bad Practices: Use of System.exit()

This vulnerability occurs when a J2EE application directly calls System.exit(), which forcibly terminates the entire application server…

CWE-395 Sibling

Use of NullPointerException Catch to Detect NULL Pointer Dereference

Using a try-catch block for NullPointerException as a substitute for proper null checks is an anti-pattern. This approach masks the root…

CWE-396 Sibling

Declaration of Catch for Generic Exception

This weakness occurs when code catches a generic exception type like 'Exception' or 'Throwable', which can hide specific errors and create…

CWE-397 Sibling

Declaration of Throws for Generic Exception

This vulnerability occurs when a method is declared to throw an overly broad exception type, such as a generic 'Exception' or 'Throwable'.…

CWE-455 Sibling

Non-exit on Failed Initialization

This vulnerability occurs when software continues to run as normal after encountering a critical security failure during its startup…

CWE-584 Sibling

Return Inside Finally Block

This vulnerability occurs when a function places a return statement inside a finally block. This dangerous pattern silently discards any…

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.