Category

Learn

7 articles

All Review 14 Cybersecurity 8 Learn 7 Application Security 5 Threat Modelling 1 Code Remediation 1 Vulnerability Remediation 1 AI Code Security 1 AI Code Analysis 1 Company 1 comparison 1 Investment 1
AI原生修复：应对氛围编码安全挑战
Learn

AI原生修复：应对氛围编码安全挑战

仅靠检测已无法跟上AI驱动的开发速度。AI原生修复是下一层防线——帮助团队在SDLC的每个阶段修复、验证并追踪AI生成代码中的漏洞。

Josuanstya Lovdianchel Josuanstya Lovdianchel ·
Vibe Coding 安全：在 AI 生成代码上线前确保其安全
Learn

Vibe Coding 安全：在 AI 生成代码上线前确保其安全

AI 编码工具正在编写近一半的新代码。其中 45% 的代码在发布时至少包含一个漏洞。Vibe Coding 安全是一种保护由 AI 创建的软件安全的实践——在风险到达生产环境前进行检测、优先级排序和修复。

Josuanstya Lovdianchel Josuanstya Lovdianchel ·
DevSecOps 武器库：从零到英雄
Learn

DevSecOps 武器库：从零到英雄

运行 `trivy image` 不是 DevSecOps——而是噪声生成。真正的安全工程是关于信号与噪声的比率。本指南提供了17种行业标准工具的生产级配置，以在不影响业务的情况下阻止漏洞，分为三个阶段：预提交、CI 守门员和运行时扫描。

José Palanco José Palanco ·
减少噪音：让您的安全工具真正为您服务
Learn

减少噪音：让您的安全工具真正为您服务

安装安全工具是简单的部分。困难的部分从“第二天”开始，当该工具报告5000个新漏洞时。本指南重点介绍漏洞管理：如何过滤重复警报、管理误报以及跟踪实际衡量成功的指标。了解如何从“发现漏洞”转变为“修复风险”，而不让您的团队不堪重负。

José Palanco José Palanco ·
无摩擦安全：将工具集成到开发者工作流程中
Learn

无摩擦安全：将工具集成到开发者工作流程中

开发者体验（DevEx）在选择安全工具时至关重要。安全应该让开发者的工作更轻松，而不是更困难。如果开发者必须离开他们的编码环境或使用其他仪表板来发现问题，这会减慢他们的速度，并降低他们使用这些工具的可能性。

Khul Anwar Khul Anwar ·
Ready to validate what matters?

Ready to validate what matters?

Plexicus is Proof-Driven AppSec: validated findings, contextual understanding, and reviewed remediation — anchored in evidence, scoped with you.

Request AI Swarm Pentest
Qualification

Check whether AI Swarm Pentest fits your environment.

Share the minimum context. We will review the scope and tell you the next commercial step.

Before submitting — verify you fit

Teams with fewer than 50 developers: start a 14-day Trial instead of booking a demo. Start a 14-day Trial →

0 / 280

No commitment. If you don't fit, we'll tell you.
SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorised target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)