Category

Review

14 articles

Top 15 AI Pentest Tools for 2026: Autonomous Agents Ranked & Compared
Review

Top 15 AI Pentest Tools for 2026: Autonomous Agents Ranked & Compared

The 2026 AI pentest market splits into three lanes: autonomous agents that exploit live systems, BAS platforms that emulate adversary techniques, and PTaaS vendors that wrap AI around human testers. We ranked 15 of them on signed-scope evidence, replay verification, and pricing transparency so you can pick the right one for your next pentest run.

Josuanstya Lovdianchel Josuanstya Lovdianchel ·
2026年顶级DevSecOps工具及替代方案TOP 15
Review

2026年顶级DevSecOps工具及替代方案TOP 15

DevSecOps已成为交付现代软件的标准。团队不再在开发完成后将代码移交给安全部门。到2026年,安全已成为流水线每个步骤中共享且自动化的组成部分。在本指南中,我们汇总了2026年值得尝试的顶级DevSecOps工具,涵盖每个工具的功能、优缺点以及它所替代的具体传统解决方案。

Khul Anwar Khul Anwar ·
2026年十大CNAPP工具 | 云原生应用保护平台
Review

2026年十大CNAPP工具 | 云原生应用保护平台

想象一下,在一家快速发展的科技公司的安全运营中心,一个繁忙的星期五下午。团队已经深陷警报之中,接连收到通知,屏幕上不断闪烁着需要立即关注的“关键”问题。他们在各种提供商中拥有超过1,000个云账户,每个账户都在为警报的浪潮贡献力量。然而,许多这些警报甚至与暴露在互联网的资源无关,这让团队因规模和明显的紧迫性而感到沮丧和不知所措。云安全是复杂的。

Khul Anwar Khul Anwar ·
2025年最佳SCA工具:扫描依赖项,保护您的软件供应链
Review

2025年最佳SCA工具:扫描依赖项,保护您的软件供应链

现代应用程序在很大程度上依赖于第三方和开源库。这加快了开发速度,但也增加了攻击风险。每个依赖项都可能引入未修补的安全漏洞、风险许可证或过时的软件包等问题。软件组成分析(SCA)工具有助于解决这些问题。

José Palanco José Palanco ·
Ready to validate what matters?

Ready to validate what matters?

Plexicus is Proof-Driven AppSec: validated findings, contextual understanding, and reviewed remediation — anchored in evidence, scoped with you.

Qualification

Check whether AI Swarm Pentest fits your environment.

Share the minimum context. We will review the scope and tell you the next commercial step.

Before submitting — verify you fit
Do you have a recent classic pentest you're not happy with?

0 / 280

No commitment. If you don't fit, we'll tell you.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorised target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)