CWE-1290 Base Incomplete

Incorrect Decoding of Security Identifiers

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware decoder incorrectly interprets security identifiers in bus transactions, allowing untrusted agents to gain unauthorized access to protected assets.

Definition

What is CWE-1290?

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware decoder incorrectly interprets security identifiers in bus transactions, allowing untrusted agents to gain unauthorized access to protected assets.
In a System-on-Chip (SoC), hardware components communicate through bus transactions that include security identifiers. These identifiers determine what actions an agent can perform—like reading, writing, or controlling a resource. A decoder maps these identifiers to specific access privileges. If this decoding logic is flawed, the system's fundamental access control can be bypassed. The core risk arises when the decoder mistakenly maps an untrusted agent's identifier to a trusted one's privileges. This error effectively promotes an unauthorized agent's access level, letting it interact with assets it shouldn't. Developers must ensure the decoding logic is rigorously verified to prevent such privilege escalation in hardware security mechanisms.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1290

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Consider a system that has four bus masters and a decoder. The decoder is supposed to decode every bus transaction and assign a corresponding security identifier. The security identifier is used to determine accesses to the assets. The bus transaction that contains the security information is Bus_transaction [15:14], and the bits 15 through 14 contain the security identifier information. The table below provides bus masters as well as their security identifiers and trust assumptions: | Bus Master | Security Identifier Decoding | Trust Assumptions | | --- | --- | --- | | Master_0 | "00" | Untrusted | | Master_1 | "01" | Trusted | | Master_2 | "10" | Untrusted | | Master_3 | "11" | Untrusted | The assets are the AES-Key registers for encryption or decryption. The key is 128 bits implemented as a set of four 32-bit registers. The AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY is used to define which agents with a security identifier in the transaction can access the AES-key registers. The size of the security identifier is 4 bits (i.e., bit 3 through 0). Each bit in these 4 bits defines a security identifier. There are only 4 security identifiers that are allowed accesses to the AES-key registers. The number of the bit when set (i.e., "1") allows respective action from an agent whose identity matches the number of the bit. If clear (i.e., "0"), disallows the respective action to that corresponding agent. | Register | Field description | | --- | --- | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 | AES key [0:31] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_1 | AES key [32:63] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_2 | AES key [64:95] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 | AES key [96:127] for encryption or decryption Default 0x00000000 | | AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLCY | [31:4] Default 0x00000000 [3:0]-0x01 agent with Security Identified "1" has access to AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_0 through AES_ENC_DEC_KEY_3 registers |

  2. 2

    The following Pseudo code outlines the process of checking the value of the Security Identifier within the AES_KEY_ACCESS_POLICY register:

  3. 3

    Below is a decoder's Pseudo code that only checks for bit [14] of the bus transaction to determine what Security Identifier it must assign.

  4. 4

    The security identifier is two bits, but the decoder code above only checks the value of one bit. Two Masters have their bit 0 set to "1" - Master_1 and Master_3. Master_1 is trusted, while Master_3 is not. The code above would therefore allow an untrusted agent, Master_3, access to the AES-Key registers in addition to intended trusted Master_1. The decoder should check for the entire size of the security identifier in the bus-transaction signal to assign a corresponding security identifier. The following is good Pseudo code:

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Other

Below is a decoder's Pseudo code that only checks for bit [14] of the bus transaction to determine what Security Identifier it must assign.

Verwundbar Other
If (Bus_transaction[14] == "1") 
  	 Security_Identifier == "1" 
   Else 
  	 Security_Identifier == "0"
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure Other

The security identifier is two bits, but the decoder code above only checks the value of one bit. Two Masters have their bit 0 set to "1" - Master_1 and Master_3. Master_1 is trusted, while Master_3 is not. The code above would therefore allow an untrusted agent, Master_3, access to the AES-Key registers in addition to intended trusted Master_1. The decoder should check for the entire size of the security identifier in the bus-transaction signal to assign a corresponding security identifier. The following is good Pseudo code:

Sicher Other
If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "00") 
  	 Security_Identifier == "0" 
   If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "01") 
  	 Security_Identifier == "1" 
   If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "10") 
  	 Security_Identifier == "2" 
   If (Bus_transaction[15:14] == "11") 
  	 Security_Identifier == "3"
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-1290

  • Architecture and Design Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses.
  • Implementation Access and programming flows must be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing in order to check for this weakness.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-1290

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-1290 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-1290?

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware decoder incorrectly interprets security identifiers in bus transactions, allowing untrusted agents to gain unauthorized access to protected assets.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-1290?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1290 betroffen?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Bus/Interface Hardware, Not Technology-Specific.

Wie kann ich CWE-1290 verhindern?

Security identifier decoders must be reviewed for design consistency and common weaknesses. Access and programming flows must be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing in order to check for this weakness.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1290?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1290 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1290?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1290.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-1290

CWE-284 Parent

Improper Access Control

The software fails to properly limit who can access a resource, allowing unauthorized users or systems to interact with it.

CWE-1191 Sibling

On-Chip Debug and Test Interface With Improper Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware chip's debug or test interface (like JTAG) lacks proper access controls. Without correct…

CWE-1220 Sibling

Insufficient Granularity of Access Control

This vulnerability occurs when a system's access controls are too broad, allowing unauthorized users or processes to read or modify…

CWE-1224 Sibling

Improper Restriction of Write-Once Bit Fields

This vulnerability occurs when hardware write-once protection mechanisms, often called 'sticky bits,' are incorrectly implemented,…

CWE-1231 Sibling

Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification

This vulnerability occurs when hardware or firmware uses a lock bit to protect critical system registers or memory regions, but fails to…

CWE-1233 Sibling

Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…

CWE-1252 Sibling

CPU Hardware Not Configured to Support Exclusivity of Write and Execute Operations

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU's hardware is not set up to enforce a strict separation between writing data to memory and executing…

CWE-1257 Sibling

Improper Access Control Applied to Mirrored or Aliased Memory Regions

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware design maps the same physical memory to multiple addresses (aliasing or mirroring) but fails to…

CWE-1259 Sibling

Improper Restriction of Security Token Assignment

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly secure its Security Token mechanism. These tokens control which…

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.