CWE-459 Base Draft

Incomplete Cleanup

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly remove temporary files, data structures, or system resources after they are no longer needed.

Definition

What is CWE-459?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly remove temporary files, data structures, or system resources after they are no longer needed.
Incomplete cleanup happens when developers focus on the primary function of their code but neglect the final 'housekeeping' steps. This often involves forgetting to close file handles, database connections, or network sockets, or leaving temporary files in shared directories. These leftover resources can accumulate over time, leading to performance degradation, data leaks, or denial of service as system limits are reached. From a security perspective, uncleaned temporary files can expose sensitive data to other users or processes on the system. In multi-user environments, this can allow unauthorized access to session tokens, configuration secrets, or user data. The risk is particularly high when predictable filenames are used, as attackers can easily locate and exploit these residual artifacts.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-459

  • World-readable temporary file not deleted after use.

  • Temporary file not deleted after use, leaking database usernames and passwords.

  • Interaction error creates a temporary file that can not be deleted due to strong permissions.

  • Alternate data streams for NTFS files are not cleared when files are wiped (alternate channel / infoleak).

  • Alternate data streams for NTFS files are not cleared when files are wiped (alternate channel / infoleak).

  • Alternate data streams for NTFS files are not cleared when files are wiped (alternate channel / infoleak).

  • Alternate data streams for NTFS files are not cleared when files are wiped (alternate channel / infoleak).

  • Alternate data streams for NTFS files are not cleared when files are wiped (alternate channel / infoleak).

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.

  2. 2

    Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.

  3. 3

    Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.

  4. 4

    Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Java

Stream resources in a Java application should be released in a finally block, otherwise an exception thrown before the call to close() would result in an unreleased I/O resource. In the example below, the close() method is called in the try block (incorrect).

Verwundbar Java
try {
  	InputStream is = new FileInputStream(path);
  	byte b[] = new byte[is.available()];
  	is.read(b);
  	is.close();
  } catch (Throwable t) {
  	log.error("Something bad happened: " + t.getMessage());
  }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-459

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation Temporary files and other supporting resources should be deleted/released immediately after they are no longer needed.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-459

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-459 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-459?

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly remove temporary files, data structures, or system resources after they are no longer needed.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-459?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-459 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-459 verhindern?

Temporary files and other supporting resources should be deleted/released immediately after they are no longer needed.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-459?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-459 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-459?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/459.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-459

CWE-404 Parent

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…

CWE-1266 Sibling

Improper Scrubbing of Sensitive Data from Decommissioned Device

This vulnerability occurs when a system lacks a reliable method for administrators to permanently erase sensitive information before…

CWE-299 Sibling

Improper Check for Certificate Revocation

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly verify whether a security certificate has been revoked, potentially…

CWE-401 Sibling

Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when a program allocates memory but fails to properly release it after it's no longer needed, causing a gradual…

CWE-761 Sibling

Free of Pointer not at Start of Buffer

This vulnerability occurs when a program incorrectly frees a memory pointer that no longer points to the beginning of the allocated heap…

CWE-762 Sibling

Mismatched Memory Management Routines

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses incompatible functions to allocate and free memory. For example, freeing memory with a…

CWE-763 Sibling

Release of Invalid Pointer or Reference

This vulnerability occurs when a program tries to free a memory resource back to the system but uses an incorrect deallocation method or…

CWE-772 Sibling

Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly release a system resource—like memory, file handles, or network sockets—after…

CWE-775 Sibling

Missing Release of File Descriptor or Handle after Effective Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close file descriptors or handles after they are no longer needed, leaving…

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.