Scans code for missing error handling or feedback mechanisms.
CWE-1429 Base Incomplet
Missing Security-Relevant Feedback for Unexecuted Operations in Hardware Interface
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware interface discards operations without providing any security-relevant feedback, such as error notifications or logs. This silence prevents the timely…
Définition
What is CWE-1429?
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware interface discards operations without providing any security-relevant feedback, such as error notifications or logs. This silence prevents the timely detection of critical failures or active attacks, leaving systems vulnerable to undetected compromise.
Hardware interfaces that silently discard operations create a dangerous blind spot. While suppressing feedback can sometimes be a legitimate security tactic—like preventing attackers from learning internal system details—it becomes a major weakness when it also hides operational failures. Without proper error handling or logging, cryptographic failures, unauthorized access attempts, or system malfunctions can go completely unnoticed, leading to data loss, instability, and hidden security breaches.
For developers, the challenge is balancing security through obscurity with the operational need for actionable diagnostics. You must implement controlled feedback mechanisms—like secure internal logging or privileged error channels—that alert authorized systems without leaking sensitive data to potential attackers. Managing these feedback loops across complex hardware/software stacks is difficult; an ASPM like Plexicus can help by correlating system behaviors to identify where critical operations are failing silently and suggesting targeted remediations.
Impact réel
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1429
-
Open source silicon root of trust (RoT) product does not immediately report when an integrity check fails for memory requests, causing the product to accept and continue processing data [REF-1468]
Comment les attaquants l'exploitent
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
This code creates an interrupt handler. If the interrupt's priority is lower than the currently active one, the interrupt is discarded without any feedback, perhaps due to resource constraints.
- 2
The omission of feedback for the dropped lower-priority interrupt can cause developers to misinterpret the state of the system, leading to incorrect assumptions and potential system failures, such as missed sensor readings. Attackers might leverage this lack of visibility to induce conditions that lead to timing side-channels. For example, an attacker could intentionally flood the system with high-priority interrupts, forcing the system to discard lower-priority interrupts consistently. If these discarded interrupts correspond to processes executing critical security functions (e.g., cryptographic key handling), an attacker might measure system timing variations to infer when and how those functions are executing. This creates a timing side channel that could be used to extract sensitive information. Moreover, since these lower-priority interrupts are not reported, the system remains unaware that critical tasks such as sensor data collection or maintenance routines, are being starved of execution. Over time, this can lead to functional failures or watchdog time resets in real-time systems. One way to address this problem could be to use structured logging to provide visibility into discarded interrupts. This allows administrators, developers, or other authorized entities to track missed interrupts and optimize the system.
- 3
Consider a SoC design with these component IPs: IP 1. Execution Core IP 2 SoC Fabric (NoC, tile etc. ) IP 3 Memory Controller External/ internal memory. The Core executes operations that trigger transactions that traverse the HW fabric links to read/write to the final memory module. There can be unexpected errors in each link. For adding reliability and redundance, features like ECCs are used in these transactions. Error correction capabilities have to define how many error bits can be detected and which errors can be corrected, and which are uncorrectable errors. In design, often the severity level and response on different errors is allowed to be configured by system firmware modules like BIOS.
- 4
For system security, if an uncorrectable error occurs but is not reported to the execution core and handled before the core attempts to consume the data that is read/written through the corrupted transactions, then this could enable silent data corruption (SDC) attacks. In the case of confidential compute technologies where system firmware is not a trusted component, error handling controls can be misconfigured to trigger this weakness and attack the assets protected by confidential compute.
Exemple de code vulnérable
Vulnerable C
This code creates an interrupt handler. If the interrupt's priority is lower than the currently active one, the interrupt is discarded without any feedback, perhaps due to resource constraints.
void interrupt_handler(int irq) {
```
if (irq_priority[irq] < current_priority) {
return;
}
process_interrupt(irq);
} Exemple de code sécurisé
Secure C
The omission of feedback for the dropped lower-priority interrupt can cause developers to misinterpret the state of the system, leading to incorrect assumptions and potential system failures, such as missed sensor readings. Attackers might leverage this lack of visibility to induce conditions that lead to timing side-channels. For example, an attacker could intentionally flood the system with high-priority interrupts, forcing the system to discard lower-priority interrupts consistently. If these discarded interrupts correspond to processes executing critical security functions (e.g., cryptographic key handling), an attacker might measure system timing variations to infer when and how those functions are executing. This creates a timing side channel that could be used to extract sensitive information. Moreover, since these lower-priority interrupts are not reported, the system remains unaware that critical tasks such as sensor data collection or maintenance routines, are being starved of execution. Over time, this can lead to functional failures or watchdog time resets in real-time systems. One way to address this problem could be to use structured logging to provide visibility into discarded interrupts. This allows administrators, developers, or other authorized entities to track missed interrupts and optimize the system.
// Priority threshold for active interrupts
int current_priority = 3;
// Simulated priority levels for different IRQs
int irq_priority[5] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
void process_interrupt(int irq) {
```
printf("Processing interrupt %d\n", irq);
}
void interrupt_handler(int irq) {
if (irq_priority[irq] < current_priority) {
// Log the dropped interrupt using structured feedback
fprintf(stderr, "Warning: Interrupt %d dropped (Priority: %d < Current: %d)\n",
irq, irq_priority[irq], current_priority);
exit(EXIT_FAILURE); // Exit with failure status to indicate a critical issue.
}
process_interrupt(irq);
} What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention
How to prevent CWE-1429
- Architecture and Design Incorporate logging and feedback mechanisms during the design phase to ensure proper handling of discarded operations.
- Implementation Developers should ensure that every critical operation includes proper logging or error feedback mechanisms.
Signaux de détection
How to detect CWE-1429
Experts manually inspect the code for unhandled operations.
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-1429 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Questions fréquentes Qu'est-ce que CWE-1429 ?
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-1429 ?
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-1429 ?
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-1429 ?
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-1429 ?
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-1429 ?
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-1429 ?
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware interface discards operations without providing any security-relevant feedback, such as error notifications or logs. This silence prevents the timely detection of critical failures or active attacks, leaving systems vulnerable to undetected compromise.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-1429 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-1429 ?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++, Verilog, Hardware Description Language, ARM, x86, Embedded, Security Hardware.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-1429 ?
Incorporate logging and feedback mechanisms during the design phase to ensure proper handling of discarded operations. Developers should ensure that every critical operation includes proper logging or error feedback mechanisms.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-1429 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-1429 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-1429 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1429.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Faiblesses associées
Weaknesses related to CWE-1429
CWE-223 Parent
Omission of Security-relevant Information
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to capture or present crucial security-related details, such as the origin of a…
CWE-778 Frère
Insufficient Logging
This weakness occurs when an application fails to properly record important security events or captures them with insufficient detail,…
CWE-392 Pair
Missing Report of Error Condition
This vulnerability occurs when a system fails to properly signal that an error has happened. Instead of returning a clear error code,…
Prêt quand vous l'êtes
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.