Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Active Debug Code
This vulnerability occurs when software is deployed to production with debugging or diagnostic features still enabled and accessible.
What is CWE-489?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-489
Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Debug code can be used to bypass authentication. For example, suppose an application has a login script that receives a username and a password. Assume also that a third, optional, parameter, called "debug", is interpreted by the script as requesting a switch to debug mode, and that when this parameter is given the username and password are not checked. In such a case, it is very simple to bypass the authentication process if the special behavior of the application regarding the debug parameter is known. In a case where the form is:
- 2
Then a conforming link will look like:
- 3
An attacker can change this to:
- 4
Which will grant the attacker access to the site, bypassing the authentication process.
Vulnerable HTML
Debug code can be used to bypass authentication. For example, suppose an application has a login script that receives a username and a password. Assume also that a third, optional, parameter, called "debug", is interpreted by the script as requesting a switch to debug mode, and that when this parameter is given the username and password are not checked. In such a case, it is very simple to bypass the authentication process if the special behavior of the application regarding the debug parameter is known. In a case where the form is:
<FORM ACTION="/authenticate_login.cgi">
<INPUT TYPE=TEXT name=username>
<INPUT TYPE=PASSWORD name=password>
<INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT>
</FORM> An attacker can change this to:
http://TARGET/authenticate_login.cgi?username=&password=&debug=1 Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-489
- Build and Compilation / Distribution Remove debug code before deploying the application.
How to detect CWE-489
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-489 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-489 ?
This vulnerability occurs when software is deployed to production with debugging or diagnostic features still enabled and accessible.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-489 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-489 ?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Technology-Specific, ICS/OT.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-489 ?
Remove debug code before deploying the application.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-489 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-489 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-489 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/489.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-489
Improper Adherence to Coding Standards
This weakness occurs when developers don't consistently follow established coding standards and best practices, which can introduce…
Use of Redundant Code
This weakness occurs when a codebase contains identical or nearly identical logic duplicated across multiple functions, methods, or…
Architecture with Number of Horizontal Layers Outside of Expected Range
This occurs when a software system is built with either too many or too few distinct architectural layers, falling outside a recommended…
Invokable Control Element with Large Number of Outward Calls
This weakness occurs when a single function, method, or callable code block makes an excessively high number of calls to other objects or…
Insufficient Technical Documentation
This weakness occurs when a software or hardware product lacks comprehensive technical documentation. Missing or incomplete details about…
Insufficient Encapsulation
This weakness occurs when a software component exposes too much of its internal workings, such as data structures or implementation logic.…
Runtime Resource Management Control Element in a Component Built to Run on Application Servers
This weakness occurs when an application built to run on a managed application server bypasses the server's high-level APIs and instead…
Missing Serialization Control Element
This weakness occurs when a class or data structure is marked as serializable but lacks the required control methods to properly handle…
Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design
This weakness occurs when the actual code implementation deviates from the intended design described in its official documentation,…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-489 officiel https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/489.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.