CWE-1327 Base Incomplete

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a wildcard, accepting connections from any network interface on…

Definition

What is CWE-1327?

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a wildcard, accepting connections from any network interface on the host system.
Binding to 0.0.0.0 tells the server to listen for connections on all available network interfaces—including public, private, and localhost addresses. While this is sometimes necessary for development or specific services, it often unintentionally exposes the service to networks it shouldn't be accessible from, like the public internet, when only a specific internal or management network was intended. This creates a significant security gap by bypassing network segmentation and firewall controls. An attacker who can reach any of the host's interfaces can potentially connect to the service. Developers should explicitly bind to specific, intended IP addresses (like 127.0.0.1 for local-only or a specific internal IP) to enforce the principle of least privilege and reduce the system's attack surface.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1327

  • Desktop manager for Kubernetes and container management binds a service to 0.0.0.0, allowing users on the network to make requests to a dashboard API.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    Identify a code path that handles untrusted input without validation.

  2. 2

    Craft a payload that exercises the unsafe behavior — injection, traversal, overflow, or logic abuse.

  3. 3

    Deliver the payload through a normal request and observe the application's reaction.

  4. 4

    Iterate until the response leaks data, executes attacker code, or escalates privileges.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable Other

The following code snippet uses 0.0.0.0 in a Puppet script.

Vulnerable Other
signingserver::instance {

```
   "nightly-key-signing-server": 
  	 listenaddr => "0.0.0.0",
  	 port => "9100",
  	 code_tag => "SIGNING_SERVER",
   }
Secure code example

Secure Other

The Puppet code snippet is used to provision a signing server that will use 0.0.0.0 to accept traffic. However, as 0.0.0.0 is unrestricted, malicious users may use this IP address to launch frequent requests and cause denial of service attacks.

Secure Other
signingserver::instance {

```
   "nightly-key-signing-server": 
  	 listenaddr => "127.0.0.1",
  	 port => "9100",
  	 code_tag => "SIGNING_SERVER",
   }
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-1327

  • System Configuration Assign IP addresses that are not 0.0.0.0.
  • System Configuration Unwanted connections to the configured server may be denied through a firewall or other packet filtering measures.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-1327

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

CWE-1327

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-1327?

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a wildcard, accepting connections from any network interface on the host system.

How serious is CWE-1327?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-1327?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Other, Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Web Server, Client Server, Cloud Computing.

How can I prevent CWE-1327?

Assign IP addresses that are not 0.0.0.0. Unwanted connections to the configured server may be denied through a firewall or other packet filtering measures.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-1327?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-1327 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-1327?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1327.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Related weaknesses

Weaknesses related to CWE-1327

CWE-668 Parent

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application unintentionally makes a resource accessible to users or systems that should not have…

CWE-1189 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly separate shared hardware resources between secure (trusted) and…

CWE-1282 Sibling

Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory

This vulnerability occurs when data that should be permanent and unchangeable—like a bootloader, device IDs, or one-time configuration…

CWE-1331 Sibling

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a Network on Chip (NoC) fails to properly separate its internal, shared resources—like buffers, switches,…

CWE-134 Sibling

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a format string from an untrusted, external source (like user input, a network packet, or a…

CWE-200 Sibling

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

CWE-374 Sibling

Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

This vulnerability occurs when a function receives a direct reference to mutable data, such as an object or array, instead of a safe copy…

CWE-375 Sibling

Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

This vulnerability occurs when a method directly returns a reference to its internal mutable data, allowing untrusted calling code to…

CWE-377 Sibling

Insecure Temporary File

This vulnerability occurs when an application creates temporary files with insecure permissions or in predictable locations, allowing…

Ready to validate what matters?

Ready to validate what matters?

Plexicus is Proof-Driven AppSec: validated findings, contextual understanding, and reviewed remediation — anchored in evidence, scoped with you.

Qualification

Check whether AI Swarm Pentest fits your environment.

Share the minimum context. We will review the scope and tell you the next commercial step.

Before submitting — verify you fit

Teams with fewer than 50 developers: start a 14-day Trial instead of booking a demo. Start a 14-day Trial →

0 / 280

No commitment. If you don't fit, we'll tell you.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorised target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)