CWE-540 Base Incomplete

Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code

This vulnerability occurs when sensitive information like passwords, API keys, or internal logic is exposed within source code that remains accessible on a web server or in a public repository.

Definition

What is CWE-540?

This vulnerability occurs when sensitive information like passwords, API keys, or internal logic is exposed within source code that remains accessible on a web server or in a public repository.
Leaving source code containing sensitive data on a live server creates a major security risk. Attackers can directly access these files to harvest credentials, encryption keys, or understand application logic, bypassing the intended security controls of the compiled or executed application. For example, if an attacker retrieves a Perl, Python, or PHP script's source, they can analyze it for bugs, hardcoded database logins, or business logic flaws. This information dramatically simplifies launching further attacks, as it provides a blueprint of the application's weaknesses and secret mechanisms.
Real-world impact

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-540

  • Server for Team Awareness Kit (TAK) application includes sensitive tokens in the JavaScript source code.

  • The LDAP password might be visible in the html code of a rendered page in an IT Asset Management tool.

  • Version numbers and internal hostnames leaked in HTML comments.

How attackers exploit it

Step-by-step attacker path

  1. 1

    The following code uses an include file to store database credentials:

  2. 2

    database.inc

  3. 3

    login.php

  4. 4

    If the server does not have an explicit handler set for .inc files it may send the contents of database.inc to an attacker without pre-processing, if the attacker requests the file directly. This will expose the database name and password.

  5. 5

    The following comment, embedded in a JSP, will be displayed in the resulting HTML output.

Vulnerable code example

Vulnerable PHP

database.inc

Vulnerable PHP
<?php
  $dbName = 'usersDB';
  $dbPassword = 'skjdh#67nkjd3$3$';
  ?>
Secure code example

Secure pseudo

Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Prevention checklist

How to prevent CWE-540

  • Architecture and Design / System Configuration Recommendations include removing this script from the web server and moving it to a location not accessible from the Internet.
Detection signals

How to detect CWE-540

SAST High

Run static analysis (SAST) on the codebase looking for the unsafe pattern in the data flow.

DAST Moderate

Run dynamic application security testing against the live endpoint.

Runtime Moderate

Watch runtime logs for unusual exception traces, malformed input, or authorization bypass attempts.

Code review Moderate

Code review: flag any new code that handles input from this surface without using the validated framework helpers.

CWE-540

Don't catalog this weakness. Prove it's reachable.

Plexicus turns CWE catalogs into evidence: every CWE-pattern is matched against your real code graph, reach is proven on a sandbox clone, and verified findings ship as reviewed PRs.

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is CWE-540?

This vulnerability occurs when sensitive information like passwords, API keys, or internal logic is exposed within source code that remains accessible on a web server or in a public repository.

How serious is CWE-540?

MITRE has not published a likelihood-of-exploit rating for this weakness. Treat it as medium-impact until your threat model proves otherwise.

What languages or platforms are affected by CWE-540?

MITRE has not specified affected platforms for this CWE — it can apply across most application stacks.

How can I prevent CWE-540?

Recommendations include removing this script from the web server and moving it to a location not accessible from the Internet.

How does Plexicus detect and fix CWE-540?

Plexicus's SAST engine matches the data-flow signature for CWE-540 on every commit. When a match is found, our Codex Remedium agent opens a fix PR with the corrected code, tests, and a one-line summary for the reviewer.

Where can I learn more about CWE-540?

MITRE publishes the canonical definition at https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/540.html. You can also reference OWASP and NIST documentation for adjacent guidance.

Ready to validate what matters?

Ready to validate what matters?

Plexicus is Proof-Driven AppSec: validated findings, contextual understanding, and reviewed remediation — anchored in evidence, scoped with you.

Qualification

Check whether AI Swarm Pentest fits your environment.

Share the minimum context. We will review the scope and tell you the next commercial step.

Before submitting — verify you fit

Teams with fewer than 50 developers: start a 14-day Trial instead of booking a demo. Start a 14-day Trial →

0 / 280

No commitment. If you don't fit, we'll tell you.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorised target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)