Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.
Inaccurate Comments
This weakness occurs when code comments do not correctly describe or explain the actual behavior of the associated code. Misleading comments create a disconnect between what the documentation says…
What is CWE-1116?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1116
Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
In the following Java example the code performs a calculation to determine how much medicine to administer. A comment is provided to give insight into what the calculation shoud be doing. Unfortunately the comment does not match the actual code and thus leaves the reader to wonder which is correct.
- 2
In the correction below, the code functionality has been verified, and the comment has been corrected to reflect the proper calculation.
- 3
Note that in real-world code, these values should be validated to disallow negative numbers, prevent integer overflow, etc.
Vulnerable Java
In the following Java example the code performs a calculation to determine how much medicine to administer. A comment is provided to give insight into what the calculation shoud be doing. Unfortunately the comment does not match the actual code and thus leaves the reader to wonder which is correct.
public class Main {
```
public static void main(String[] args) {
int pt_weight = 83;
int mg_per_kg = 3;
int daily_dose = 0;
// Add the patient weight and Mg/Kg to calculate the correct daily dose
daily_dose = pt_weight * mg_per_kg;
return dosage;
}
} Secure Java
In the correction below, the code functionality has been verified, and the comment has been corrected to reflect the proper calculation.
public class Main {
```
public static void main(String[] args) {
int pt_weight = 83;
int mg_per_kg = 3;
int daily_dose = 0;
// Multiply the patient weight and Mg/Kg to calculate the correct daily dose
daily_dose = pt_weight * mg_per_kg;
return dosage;
}
} How to prevent CWE-1116
- Implementation Verify that each comment accurately reflects what is intended to happen during execution of the code.
How to detect CWE-1116
Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.
Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.
Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.
Plexicus erkennt CWE-1116 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-1116?
This weakness occurs when code comments do not correctly describe or explain the actual behavior of the associated code. Misleading comments create a disconnect between what the documentation says and what the program actually does.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-1116?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1116 betroffen?
MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.
Wie kann ich CWE-1116 verhindern?
Verify that each comment accurately reflects what is intended to happen during execution of the code.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1116?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1116 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1116?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1116.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1116
Inappropriate Source Code Style or Formatting
This weakness occurs when source code violates established style guidelines for formatting, indentation, whitespace, or commenting, making…
Invokable Control Element with Excessive Volume of Commented-out Code
This weakness occurs when a callable function, method, or procedure contains a large amount of inactive, commented-out code within its…
Inconsistent Naming Conventions for Identifiers
This weakness occurs when a codebase uses mixed naming styles for elements like variables, functions, data types, or files, creating an…
Insufficient Use of Symbolic Constants
This weakness occurs when developers embed raw numbers or text strings directly in code instead of using named symbolic constants, making…
Insufficient Isolation of Symbolic Constant Definitions
This weakness occurs when a codebase uses symbolic constants (like named values for numbers or strings) but scatters their definitions…
Use of Same Variable for Multiple Purposes
This weakness occurs when a single variable is reused to handle multiple, unrelated tasks or to store different pieces of data throughout…
Inappropriate Comment Style
This weakness occurs when source code comments are written in a style or format that doesn't match the project's established standards or…
Inappropriate Whitespace Style
This weakness occurs when source code uses inconsistent or non-standard whitespace formatting, such as irregular indentation, spacing, or…
Source Code Element without Standard Prologue
This weakness occurs when source code files or modules lack a consistent, standardized header or prologue that the development team has…
Further reading
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.