CWE-266 Base Draft

Incorrect Privilege Assignment

This vulnerability occurs when a system mistakenly grants a user, process, or entity a specific permission or privilege they should not have. This error creates an unintended level of access,…

Definition

What is CWE-266?

This vulnerability occurs when a system mistakenly grants a user, process, or entity a specific permission or privilege they should not have. This error creates an unintended level of access, allowing the actor to perform actions beyond their intended authority.
Incorrect privilege assignment is a core authorization flaw where the system's security model fails to properly enforce the principle of least privilege. Instead of granting the minimum access necessary for a function, the system erroneously provides elevated rights—such as administrative capabilities, write access to sensitive files, or the ability to modify other users' data. This mistake often stems from misconfigured access control lists (ACLs), flawed role-based access control (RBAC) logic, or errors during user/role provisioning. From a developer's perspective, this vulnerability is frequently introduced during code deployment or user management, rather than within the core application logic itself. Common scenarios include copying permission sets from high-privilege accounts, incorrectly mapping users to roles, or failing to validate inherited permissions. To prevent this, always implement explicit privilege assignment, audit permission changes, and use automated tools to verify that access controls match the intended security policy before deployment.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-266

  • untrusted user placed in unix "wheel" group

  • Product allows users to grant themselves certain rights that can be used to escalate privileges.

  • Product uses group ID of a user instead of the group, causing it to run with different privileges. This is resultant from some other unknown issue.

  • Product mistakenly assigns a particular status to an entity, leading to increased privileges.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    The following example demonstrates the weakness.

  2. 2

    The following example demonstrates the weakness.

  3. 3

    This application sends a special intent with a flag that allows the receiving application to read a data file for backup purposes.

  4. 4

    Any malicious application can register to receive this intent. Because of the FLAG_GRANT_READ_URI_PERMISSION included with the intent, the malicious receiver code can read the user's data.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable C

The following example demonstrates the weakness.

Verwundbar C
seteuid(0);
```
/* do some stuff */* 
  
  seteuid(getuid());
Angreifer-Payload
Angreifer-Payload Java
public class CallReceiver extends BroadcastReceiver {
  	@Override
  	public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
  		Uri userData = intent.getData();
  		stealUserData(userData);
  	}
  }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure pseudo

Sicher pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-266

  • Architecture and Design / Operation Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design / Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-266

SAST High

Führe statische Analyse (SAST) auf der Codebasis aus und suche im Datenfluss nach dem unsicheren Muster.

DAST Moderate

Führe dynamische Application-Security-Tests gegen den Live-Endpoint aus.

Runtime Moderate

Beobachte Runtime-Logs auf ungewöhnliche Exception-Traces, fehlerhafte Eingaben oder Versuche, Autorisierung zu umgehen.

Code review Moderate

Code Review: Markiere jeden neuen Code, der Eingaben von dieser Oberfläche ohne validierte Framework-Helper verarbeitet.

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-266 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-266?

This vulnerability occurs when a system mistakenly grants a user, process, or entity a specific permission or privilege they should not have. This error creates an unintended level of access, allowing the actor to perform actions beyond their intended authority.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-266?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-266 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-266 verhindern?

Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software. Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need…

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-266?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-266 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-266?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/266.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-266

CWE-269 Parent

Improper Privilege Management

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to correctly manage user permissions, allowing someone to perform actions or access…

CWE-250 Sibling

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…

CWE-267 Sibling

Privilege Defined With Unsafe Actions

This vulnerability occurs when a system grants a user, role, or process a specific permission that can be misused to perform dangerous,…

CWE-268 Sibling

Privilege Chaining

Privilege chaining occurs when an attacker combines two separate permissions or capabilities, neither of which is dangerous on its own, to…

CWE-270 Sibling

Privilege Context Switching Error

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage user permissions while moving between different security contexts,…

CWE-271 Sibling

Privilege Dropping / Lowering Errors

This vulnerability occurs when a system or process fails to reduce its elevated permissions before transferring control of a resource to a…

CWE-274 Sibling

Improper Handling of Insufficient Privileges

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage situations where it lacks the necessary permissions to execute an…

CWE-648 Sibling

Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs

This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly uses functions that require special permissions. Attackers can exploit these mistakes…

CWE-286 Peer

Incorrect User Management

This vulnerability occurs when an application incorrectly handles user accounts, roles, or group memberships, leading to improper access…

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.