CWE-570 Base Draft

Expression is Always False

This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that can never evaluate to true, causing a section of the program to be permanently unreachable.

Definition

What is CWE-570?

This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that can never evaluate to true, causing a section of the program to be permanently unreachable.
An 'always false' expression is a type of dead code that often results from logical errors, incorrect assumptions about data, or leftover debugging checks. For example, comparing a variable against a fixed value it can never hold, or checking a condition after it has already been definitively ruled out earlier in the logic. This creates a maintenance hazard, as developers might waste time debugging non-functional code, and it can mask deeper logical flaws that affect the program's real behavior. While the unreachable code itself might not directly cause a crash, it indicates flawed reasoning that could lead to security issues elsewhere. It can prevent security-critical validation routines from executing, cause resource leaks if cleanup code is skipped, or create unexpected program flow that attackers could analyze to understand the codebase. Regular code reviews and static analysis tools are effective at catching these expressions before they reach production.
Auswirkungen in der Praxis

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-570

Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.

Wie Angreifer es ausnutzen

Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt

  1. 1

    In the following Java example the updateUserAccountOrder() method used within an e-business product ordering/inventory application will validate the product number that was ordered and the user account number. If they are valid, the method will update the product inventory, the user account, and the user order appropriately.

  2. 2

    However, the method never sets the isValidAccount variable after initializing it to false so the isValidProduct is mistakenly used twice. The result is that the expression "isValidProduct && isValidAccount" will always evaluate to false, so the updateAccountOrder() method will never be invoked. This will create serious problems with the product ordering application since the user account and inventory databases will be updated but the order will not be updated.

  3. 3

    This can be easily corrected by updating the appropriate variable.

  4. 4

    In the following example, the hasReadWriteAccess method uses bit masks and bit operators to determine if a user has read and write privileges for a particular process. The variable mask is defined as a bit mask from the BIT_READ and BIT_WRITE constants that have been defined. The variable mask is used within the predicate of the hasReadWriteAccess method to determine if the userMask input parameter has the read and write bits set.

  5. 5

    However the bit operator used to initialize the mask variable is the AND operator rather than the intended OR operator (CWE-480), this resulted in the variable mask being set to 0. As a result, the if statement will always evaluate to false and never get executed.

Verwundbares Codebeispiel

Vulnerable Java

In the following Java example the updateUserAccountOrder() method used within an e-business product ordering/inventory application will validate the product number that was ordered and the user account number. If they are valid, the method will update the product inventory, the user account, and the user order appropriately.

Verwundbar Java 
public void updateUserAccountOrder(String productNumber, String accountNumber) {
  		boolean isValidProduct = false;
  		boolean isValidAccount = false;
  		if (validProductNumber(productNumber)) {
  			isValidProduct = true;
  			updateInventory(productNumber);
  		}
  		else {
  			return;
  		}
  		if (validAccountNumber(accountNumber)) {
  			isValidProduct = true;
  			updateAccount(accountNumber, productNumber);
  		}
  		if (isValidProduct && isValidAccount) {
  			updateAccountOrder(accountNumber, productNumber);
  		}
  }
Sicheres Codebeispiel

Secure Java

This can be easily corrected by updating the appropriate variable.

Sicher Java 
...
  if (validAccountNumber(accountNumber)) {
  	isValidAccount = true;
  	updateAccount(accountNumber, productNumber);
  }
  ...
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Präventions-Checkliste

How to prevent CWE-570

  • Testing Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.
Erkennungssignale

How to detect CWE-570

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Plexicus Auto-Fix

Plexicus erkennt CWE-570 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.

Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.

Demo anfordern Plexicus kostenlos testen
Häufig gestellte Fragen

Frequently asked questions

Was ist CWE-570?

This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that can never evaluate to true, causing a section of the program to be permanently unreachable.

Wie gravierend ist CWE-570?

MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.

Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-570 betroffen?

MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.

Wie kann ich CWE-570 verhindern?

Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.

Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-570?

Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-570 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.

Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-570?

MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/570.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.

Verwandte Schwachstellen

Weaknesses related to CWE-570

CWE-710 Parent

Improper Adherence to Coding Standards

This weakness occurs when developers don't consistently follow established coding standards and best practices, which can introduce…

CWE-1041 Sibling

Use of Redundant Code

This weakness occurs when a codebase contains identical or nearly identical logic duplicated across multiple functions, methods, or…

CWE-1044 Sibling

Architecture with Number of Horizontal Layers Outside of Expected Range

This occurs when a software system is built with either too many or too few distinct architectural layers, falling outside a recommended…

CWE-1048 Sibling

Invokable Control Element with Large Number of Outward Calls

This weakness occurs when a single function, method, or callable code block makes an excessively high number of calls to other objects or…

CWE-1059 Sibling

Insufficient Technical Documentation

This weakness occurs when a software or hardware product lacks comprehensive technical documentation. Missing or incomplete details about…

CWE-1061 Sibling

Insufficient Encapsulation

This weakness occurs when a software component exposes too much of its internal workings, such as data structures or implementation logic.…

CWE-1065 Sibling

Runtime Resource Management Control Element in a Component Built to Run on Application Servers

This weakness occurs when an application built to run on a managed application server bypasses the server's high-level APIs and instead…

CWE-1066 Sibling

Missing Serialization Control Element

This weakness occurs when a class or data structure is marked as serializable but lacks the required control methods to properly handle…

CWE-1068 Sibling

Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design

This weakness occurs when the actual code implementation deviates from the intended design described in its official documentation,…

Ressourcen

Further reading

Bereit, wenn du es bist

Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.

Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.

Kostenlos starten Demo buchen