Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or block JavaScript URIs (like 'javascript:') within HTML tag attributes. Attackers can inject malicious code into…
What is CWE-83?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-83
-
Bypass filtering of SCRIPT tags using onload in BODY, href in A, BUTTON, INPUT, and others.
-
guestbook XSS in STYLE or IMG SRC attributes.
-
Javascript in onerror attribute of IMG tag.
-
XSS in web-based email product via onmouseover event.
-
XSS via script in tag.
-
Onload, onmouseover, and other events in an e-mail attachment.
-
Onmouseover and onload events in img, link, and mail tags.
-
Javascript in onmouseover attribute in e-mail address or URL.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE hat kein Codebeispiel für diese CWE veröffentlicht. Das untenstehende Muster ist illustrativ — kanonische Referenzen findest du unter Ressourcen.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-83
- Implementation Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We often encounter data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.
- Implementation Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
- Implementation With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
- Implementation To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XMLHTTPRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
How to detect CWE-83
Plexicus erkennt CWE-83 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-83?
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or block JavaScript URIs (like 'javascript:') within HTML tag attributes. Attackers can inject malicious code into attributes such as onmouseover, onload, onerror, or style, leading to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks when the page renders.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-83?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-83 betroffen?
MITRE hat für diese CWE keine betroffenen Plattformen spezifiziert — sie kann in den meisten Anwendungs-Stacks auftreten.
Wie kann ich CWE-83 verhindern?
Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We…
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-83?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-83 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-83?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/83.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-83
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or encode user-supplied input before displaying it on a…
Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)
This vulnerability, commonly known as Basic Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user…
Improper Neutralization of Script in an Error Message Web Page
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before displaying it within an error message…
Improper Neutralization of Encoded URI Schemes in a Web Page
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that contains malicious scripts disguised…
Doubled Character XSS Manipulations
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user input that contains doubled characters, allowing…
Improper Neutralization of Invalid Characters in Identifiers in Web Pages
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly filter or escape invalid characters within web identifiers like HTML tag…
Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that uses alternative methods to execute…
Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes of IMG Tags in a Web Page
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or escape script code within the attributes of HTML IMG tags,…
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.