CWE-200 Classe Brouillon High likelihood

Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

Définition

What is CWE-200?

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.
An information exposure happens when sensitive data leaks from your system. This can include personal user details like financial or health information, internal system data such as configuration or logs, business secrets, or even metadata about your application's operations. The leak can be direct, like accidentally including private data in an error message, or indirect, where another vulnerability allows unauthorized access to protected resources. The impact depends heavily on what's exposed and who sees it. Different parties—end users, administrators, or third parties—have different expectations of privacy. While many vulnerabilities can lead to data leaks, this specific weakness focuses on errors in how the code itself handles, transmits, or sanitizes sensitive information, rather than broader access control failures.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-200

  • Rust library leaks Oauth client details in application debug logs

  • Digital Rights Management (DRM) capability for mobile platform leaks pointer information, simplifying ASLR bypass

  • Enumeration of valid usernames based on inconsistent responses

  • Account number enumeration via inconsistent responses.

  • User enumeration via discrepancies in error messages.

  • Telnet protocol allows servers to obtain sensitive environment information from clients.

  • Script calls phpinfo(), revealing system configuration to web user

  • Product sets a different TTL when a port is being filtered than when it is not being filtered, which allows remote attackers to identify filtered ports by comparing TTLs.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    The following code checks validity of the supplied username and password and notifies the user of a successful or failed login.

  2. 2

    In the above code, there are different messages for when an incorrect username is supplied, versus when the username is correct but the password is wrong. This difference enables a potential attacker to understand the state of the login function, and could allow an attacker to discover a valid username by trying different values until the incorrect password message is returned. In essence, this makes it easier for an attacker to obtain half of the necessary authentication credentials.

  3. 3

    While this type of information may be helpful to a user, it is also useful to a potential attacker. In the above example, the message for both failed cases should be the same, such as:

  4. 4

    This code tries to open a database connection, and prints any exceptions that occur.

  5. 5

    If an exception occurs, the printed message exposes the location of the configuration file the script is using. An attacker can use this information to target the configuration file (perhaps exploiting a Path Traversal weakness). If the file can be read, the attacker could gain credentials for accessing the database. The attacker may also be able to replace the file with a malicious one, causing the application to use an arbitrary database.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Perl

The following code checks validity of the supplied username and password and notifies the user of a successful or failed login.

Vulnérable Perl
my $username=param('username'); 
  my $password=param('password'); 
  if (IsValidUsername($username) == 1) 
  { 
  	if (IsValidPassword($username, $password) == 1) 
  	{ 
  		print "Login Successful"; 
  	} 
  	else 
  	{ 
  		print "Login Failed - incorrect password"; 
  	} 
  } 
  else 
  { 
  	print "Login Failed - unknown username"; 
  }
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-200

  • Architecture and Design Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-200

Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis Inter-application Flow Analysis

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Web Application Scanner Web Services Scanner Database Scanners

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Fuzz Tester Framework-based Fuzzer Automated Monitored Execution Monitored Virtual Environment - run potentially malicious code in sandbox / wrapper / virtual machine, see if it does anything suspicious

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Source code Weakness Analyzer

Architecture or Design Review High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Attack Modeling Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-200 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-200 ?

This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-200 ?

MITRE évalue la probabilité d'exploitation comme Élevée — cette faiblesse est activement exploitée et doit être priorisée pour la remédiation.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-200 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Mobile.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-200 ?

Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to…

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-200 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-200 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-200 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/200.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-200

CWE-668 Parent

Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere

This vulnerability occurs when an application unintentionally makes a resource accessible to users or systems that should not have…

CWE-1189 Frère

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources on System-on-a-Chip (SoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) fails to properly separate shared hardware resources between secure (trusted) and…

CWE-1282 Frère

Assumed-Immutable Data is Stored in Writable Memory

This vulnerability occurs when data that should be permanent and unchangeable—like a bootloader, device IDs, or one-time configuration…

CWE-1327 Frère

Binding to an Unrestricted IP Address

This vulnerability occurs when software or a service is configured to bind to the IP address 0.0.0.0 (or :: in IPv6), which acts as a…

CWE-1331 Frère

Improper Isolation of Shared Resources in Network On Chip (NoC)

This vulnerability occurs when a Network on Chip (NoC) fails to properly separate its internal, shared resources—like buffers, switches,…

CWE-134 Frère

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a format string from an untrusted, external source (like user input, a network packet, or a…

CWE-374 Frère

Passing Mutable Objects to an Untrusted Method

This vulnerability occurs when a function receives a direct reference to mutable data, such as an object or array, instead of a safe copy…

CWE-375 Frère

Returning a Mutable Object to an Untrusted Caller

This vulnerability occurs when a method directly returns a reference to its internal mutable data, allowing untrusted calling code to…

CWE-377 Frère

Insecure Temporary File

This vulnerability occurs when an application creates temporary files with insecure permissions or in predictable locations, allowing…

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.