Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.
Externally Controlled Reference to a Resource in Another Sphere
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses user-supplied input to reference a resource located outside its intended security boundary, allowing attackers to redirect operations to unintended…
What is CWE-610?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-610
-
An email client does not block loading of remote objects in a nested document.
-
Chain: a learning management tool debugger uses external input to locate previous session logs (CWE-73) and does not properly validate the given path (CWE-20), allowing for filesystem path traversal using "../" sequences (CWE-24)
-
Cryptography API uses unsafe reflection when deserializing a private key
-
Chain: Go-based Oauth2 reverse proxy can send the authenticated user to another site at the end of the authentication flow. A redirect URL with HTML-encoded whitespace characters can bypass the validation (CWE-1289) to redirect to a malicious site (CWE-601)
-
Recruiter software allows reading arbitrary files using XXE
-
Database system allows attackers to bypass sandbox restrictions by using the Reflection API.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
The following code is a Java servlet that will receive a GET request with a url parameter in the request to redirect the browser to the address specified in the url parameter. The servlet will retrieve the url parameter value from the request and send a response to redirect the browser to the url address.
- 2
The problem with this Java servlet code is that an attacker could use the RedirectServlet as part of an e-mail phishing scam to redirect users to a malicious site. An attacker could send an HTML formatted e-mail directing the user to log into their account by including in the e-mail the following link:
- 3
The user may assume that the link is safe since the URL starts with their trusted bank, bank.example.com. However, the user will then be redirected to the attacker's web site (attacker.example.net) which the attacker may have made to appear very similar to bank.example.com. The user may then unwittingly enter credentials into the attacker's web page and compromise their bank account. A Java servlet should never redirect a user to a URL without verifying that the redirect address is a trusted site.
Vulnerable Java
The following code is a Java servlet that will receive a GET request with a url parameter in the request to redirect the browser to the address specified in the url parameter. The servlet will retrieve the url parameter value from the request and send a response to redirect the browser to the url address.
public class RedirectServlet extends HttpServlet {
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws ServletException, IOException {
String query = request.getQueryString();
if (query.contains("url")) {
String url = request.getParameter("url");
response.sendRedirect(url);
}
}
} The problem with this Java servlet code is that an attacker could use the RedirectServlet as part of an e-mail phishing scam to redirect users to a malicious site. An attacker could send an HTML formatted e-mail directing the user to log into their account by including in the e-mail the following link:
<a href="http://bank.example.com/redirect?url=http://attacker.example.net">Click here to log in</a> Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-610
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-610
Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.
Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.
Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-610 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-610 ?
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses user-supplied input to reference a resource located outside its intended security boundary, allowing attackers to redirect operations to unintended locations.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-610 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-610 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-610 ?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-610 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-610 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-610 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/610.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-610
Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…
Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…
Creation of Emergent Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…
Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State
This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…
Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable
This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.
Information Loss or Omission
This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…
Incomplete Internal State Distinction
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.