According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Compare binary / bytecode to application permission manifest
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security levels, allowing lower-privileged functions to improperly…
What is CWE-653?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-653
-
Improper isolation of shared resource in a network-on-chip leads to denial of service
-
Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) device implements Advanced High-performance Bus (AHB) bridges that do not require authentication for arbitrary read and write access to the BMC's physical address space from the host, and possibly the network [REF-1138].
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.
- 2
Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.
- 3
Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.
- 4
Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-653
- Architecture and Design Break up privileges between different modules, objects, or entities. Minimize the interfaces between modules and require strong access control between them.
How to detect CWE-653
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Manual Source Code Review (not inspections) ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.) Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Attack Modeling
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-653 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-653 ?
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security levels, allowing lower-privileged functions to improperly interact with higher-privileged ones.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-653 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-653 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-653 ?
Break up privileges between different modules, objects, or entities. Minimize the interfaces between modules and require strong access control between them.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-653 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-653 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-653 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/653.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-653
Violation of Secure Design Principles
This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…
Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)
This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…
Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…
Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')
This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate…
Not Using Complete Mediation
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…
Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision
This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…
Insufficient Psychological Acceptability
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-653 officiel https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/653.html
- The Protection of Information in Computer Systems http://web.mit.edu/Saltzer/www/publications/protection/
- Separation of Privilege https://web.archive.org/web/20220126060047/https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/bsi/articles/knowledge/principles/separation-of-privilege
- CVE-2019-6260: Gaining control of BMC from the host processor https://www.flamingspork.com/blog/2019/01/23/cve-2019-6260:-gaining-control-of-bmc-from-the-host-processor/
- State-of-the-Art Resources (SOAR) for Software Vulnerability Detection, Test, and Evaluation https://www.ida.org/-/media/feature/publications/s/st/stateoftheart-resources-soar-for-software-vulnerability-detection-test-and-evaluation/p-5061.ashx
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.