CWE-1007 Base Incompleto Medium likelihood

Insufficient Visual Distinction of Homoglyphs Presented to User

Definição

What is CWE-1007?

This vulnerability occurs when an application shows text or symbols to users without clearly distinguishing between characters that look identical or very similar (called homoglyphs). Because users can't easily tell these characters apart, they might misinterpret information and accidentally perform unsafe actions, like clicking a malicious link.

Homoglyphs are different characters that appear identical or nearly identical on screen. For example, a lowercase 'L' and an uppercase 'i' can look the same in many fonts, and the Latin 'A' is visually identical to the Greek 'Alpha'. While software treats these as completely different characters, users can't see the difference, creating a gap between what the system understands and what the user perceives. Attackers exploit this visual ambiguity to trick users. A common method is creating deceptive phishing links or hostnames that mimic trusted sites. Similarly, an attacker might register a username like 'Admin' (with a Cyrillic 'A') that looks identical to the real 'Admin' account, making malicious activity harder to spot in system logs. This highlights a critical need for interfaces to help users visually distinguish between potentially confusing characters.

Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1007

CVE-2013-7236

web forum allows impersonation of users with homoglyphs in account names
CVE-2012-0584

Improper character restriction in URLs in web browser
CVE-2009-0652

Incomplete denylist does not include homoglyphs of "/" and "?" characters in URLs
CVE-2017-5015

web browser does not convert hyphens to punycode, allowing IDN spoofing in URLs
CVE-2005-0233

homoglyph spoofing using punycode in URLs and certificates
CVE-2005-0234

homoglyph spoofing using punycode in URLs and certificates
CVE-2005-0235

homoglyph spoofing using punycode in URLs and certificates

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

1
The following looks like a simple, trusted URL that a user may frequently access.
2
However, the URL above is comprised of Cyrillic characters that look identical to the expected ASCII characters. This results in most users not being able to distinguish between the two and assuming that the above URL is trusted and safe. The "e" is actually the "CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER IE" which is represented in HTML as the character &#x435, while the "a" is actually the "CYRILLIC SMALL LETTER A" which is represented in HTML as the character &#x430. The "p", "c", and "o" are also Cyrillic characters in this example. Viewing the source reveals a URL of "http://www.еxаmрlе.соm". An adversary can utilize this approach to perform an attack such as a phishing attack in order to drive traffic to a malicious website.
3
The following displays an example of how creating usernames containing homoglyphs can lead to log forgery.
4
Assume an adversary visits a legitimate, trusted domain and creates an account named "admin", except the 'a' and 'i' characters are Cyrillic characters instead of the expected ASCII. Any actions the adversary performs will be saved to the log file and look like they came from a legitimate administrator account.
5
Upon closer inspection, the account that generated three of these log entries is "аdmіn". Only the third log entry is by the legitimate admin account. This makes it more difficult to determine which actions were performed by the adversary and which actions were executed by the legitimate "admin" account.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable code

The following looks like a simple, trusted URL that a user may frequently access.

Vulnerável

http://www.еxаmрlе.соm

Payload do atacante

The following looks like a simple, trusted URL that a user may frequently access.

Payload do atacante

http://www.еxаmрlе.соm

Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo

// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}

What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.

Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-1007

Implementation Use a browser that displays Punycode for IDNs in the URL and status bars, or which color code various scripts in URLs. Due to the prominence of homoglyph attacks, several browsers now help safeguard against this attack via the use of Punycode. For example, Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome will display IDNs as Punycode if top-level domains do not restrict which characters can be used in domain names or if labels mix scripts for different languages.
Implementation Use an email client that has strict filters and prevents messages that mix character sets to end up in a user's inbox. Certain email clients such as Google's GMail prevent the use of non-Latin characters in email addresses or in links contained within emails. This helps prevent homoglyph attacks by flagging these emails and redirecting them to a user's spam folder.

Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-1007

Manual Dynamic Analysis Moderate

If utilizing user accounts, attempt to submit a username that contains homoglyphs. Similarly, check to see if links containing homoglyphs can be sent via email, web browsers, or other mechanisms.

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-1007 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Obter uma demonstração Experimente o Plexicus gratuitamente

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-1007?

Qual a gravidade do CWE-1007?

A MITRE classifica a probabilidade de exploração como Média — a exploração é realista mas normalmente requer condições específicas.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-1007?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Web Based.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-1007?

Use a browser that displays Punycode for IDNs in the URL and status bars, or which color code various scripts in URLs. Due to the prominence of homoglyph attacks, several browsers now help safeguard against this attack via the use of Punycode. For example, Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome will display IDNs as Punycode if top-level domains do not restrict which characters can be used in domain names or if labels mix scripts for different languages. Use an email client that has strict filters…

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-1007?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-1007 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-1007?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1007.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-1007

CWE-451 Pai

User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information

This vulnerability occurs when a user interface fails to accurately display or highlight crucial information, potentially misleading users…

CWE-1021 Irmão

Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly control whether its pages can be embedded within frames or UI layers…

Recursos

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.

Começar grátis Reservar uma demo