Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Active Debug Code
This vulnerability occurs when software is deployed to production with debugging or diagnostic features still enabled and accessible.
What is CWE-489?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-489
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Debug code can be used to bypass authentication. For example, suppose an application has a login script that receives a username and a password. Assume also that a third, optional, parameter, called "debug", is interpreted by the script as requesting a switch to debug mode, and that when this parameter is given the username and password are not checked. In such a case, it is very simple to bypass the authentication process if the special behavior of the application regarding the debug parameter is known. In a case where the form is:
- 2
Then a conforming link will look like:
- 3
An attacker can change this to:
- 4
Which will grant the attacker access to the site, bypassing the authentication process.
Vulnerable HTML
Debug code can be used to bypass authentication. For example, suppose an application has a login script that receives a username and a password. Assume also that a third, optional, parameter, called "debug", is interpreted by the script as requesting a switch to debug mode, and that when this parameter is given the username and password are not checked. In such a case, it is very simple to bypass the authentication process if the special behavior of the application regarding the debug parameter is known. In a case where the form is:
<FORM ACTION="/authenticate_login.cgi">
<INPUT TYPE=TEXT name=username>
<INPUT TYPE=PASSWORD name=password>
<INPUT TYPE=SUBMIT>
</FORM> An attacker can change this to:
http://TARGET/authenticate_login.cgi?username=&password=&debug=1 Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-489
- Build and Compilation / Distribution Remove debug code before deploying the application.
How to detect CWE-489
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-489 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-489?
This vulnerability occurs when software is deployed to production with debugging or diagnostic features still enabled and accessible.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-489?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-489?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Technology-Specific, ICS/OT.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-489?
Remove debug code before deploying the application.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-489?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-489 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-489?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/489.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-489
Improper Adherence to Coding Standards
This weakness occurs when developers don't consistently follow established coding standards and best practices, which can introduce…
Use of Redundant Code
This weakness occurs when a codebase contains identical or nearly identical logic duplicated across multiple functions, methods, or…
Architecture with Number of Horizontal Layers Outside of Expected Range
This occurs when a software system is built with either too many or too few distinct architectural layers, falling outside a recommended…
Invokable Control Element with Large Number of Outward Calls
This weakness occurs when a single function, method, or callable code block makes an excessively high number of calls to other objects or…
Insufficient Technical Documentation
This weakness occurs when a software or hardware product lacks comprehensive technical documentation. Missing or incomplete details about…
Insufficient Encapsulation
This weakness occurs when a software component exposes too much of its internal workings, such as data structures or implementation logic.…
Runtime Resource Management Control Element in a Component Built to Run on Application Servers
This weakness occurs when an application built to run on a managed application server bypasses the server's high-level APIs and instead…
Missing Serialization Control Element
This weakness occurs when a class or data structure is marked as serializable but lacks the required control methods to properly handle…
Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design
This weakness occurs when the actual code implementation deviates from the intended design described in its official documentation,…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-489 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/489.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.