Exposed IOCTL with Insufficient Access Control

Draft Variant
Structure: Simple
Description

This vulnerability occurs when a system exposes an IOCTL (Input/Output Control) interface that performs sensitive operations, but fails to implement proper checks to verify which users or processes are allowed to call it.

Extended Description

An IOCTL often acts as a backdoor for privileged kernel or driver functions. If this interface is left exposed without strict access controls, attackers can directly invoke it to perform actions they shouldn't be allowed to. This is especially dangerous because developers often assume only trusted, high-level software will use these commands. As a result, the IOCTL might perform minimal validation of incoming data, turning a simple interface into a major security flaw that bypasses normal security layers. The specific methods for exploiting and securing IOCTLs vary significantly across different operating systems (like Windows, Linux, or macOS) and even between versions. Therefore, mitigation requires understanding your platform's specific security model—such as using proper driver object security descriptors, role-based checks, or mandatory integrity controls—to ensure only authorized callers can reach this powerful functionality.

Common Consequences 1
Scope: IntegrityAvailabilityConfidentiality

Impact: Varies by Context

Attackers can invoke any functionality that the IOCTL offers. Depending on the functionality, the consequences may include code execution, denial-of-service, and theft of data.

Potential Mitigations 1
Phase: Architecture and Design
In Windows environments, use proper access control for the associated device or device namespace. See References.
Observed Examples 8
CVE-2009-2208Operating system does not enforce permissions on an IOCTL that can be used to modify network settings.
CVE-2008-3831Device driver does not restrict ioctl calls to its direct rendering manager.
CVE-2008-3525ioctl does not check for a required capability before processing certain requests.
CVE-2008-0322Chain: insecure device permissions allows access to an IOCTL, allowing arbitrary memory to be overwritten.
CVE-2007-4277Chain: anti-virus product uses weak permissions for a device, leading to resultant buffer overflow in an exposed IOCTL.
CVE-2007-1400Chain: sandbox allows opening of a TTY device, enabling shell commands through an exposed ioctl.
CVE-2006-4926Anti-virus product uses insecure security descriptor for a device driver, allowing access to a privileged IOCTL.
CVE-1999-0728Unauthorized user can disable keyboard or mouse by directly invoking a privileged IOCTL.
References 1
Applicable Platforms
Languages:
C : OftenC++ : Often
Modes of Introduction
Architecture and Design
Implementation
Notes
RelationshipThis can be primary to many other weaknesses when the programmer assumes that the IOCTL can only be accessed by trusted parties. For example, a program or driver might not validate incoming addresses in METHOD_NEITHER IOCTLs in Windows environments (Improper Address Validation in IOCTL with METHOD_NEITHER I/O Control Code), which could allow buffer overflow and similar attacks to take place, even when the attacker never should have been able to access the IOCTL at all.
Applicable Platform Because IOCTL functionality is typically performing low-level actions and closely interacts with the operating system, this weakness may only appear in code that is written in low-level languages.