Tag:

cnapp-værktøjer

6 articles

Top 10 Wiz.io-alternativer for 2026: Fra synlighed til afhjælpning
Review

Top 10 Wiz.io-alternativer for 2026: Fra synlighed til afhjælpning

I 2026 har prioriteterne inden for cloud-sikkerhed ændret sig. Synlighed er ikke længere det primære salgsargument, da Wiz.io allerede satte standarden i begyndelsen af 2020'erne. Nu er den største udfordring at følge med forandringernes tempo.

Khul Anwar Khul Anwar ·
Top 10 CNAPP-værktøjer til 2026 | Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms
Review

Top 10 CNAPP-værktøjer til 2026 | Cloud Native Application Protection Platforms

Forestil dig en travl fredag eftermiddag i sikkerhedsoperationscentret hos en hurtigt voksende teknologivirksomhed. Teamet, allerede dybt begravet i advarsler, modtager meddelelse efter meddelelse, deres skærme blinker med 'kritiske' problemer, der kræver øjeblikkelig opmærksomhed. De har over 1.000 cloud-konti spredt over forskellige udbydere, hver bidrager til bølgen af advarsler. Mange af disse advarsler vedrører dog ikke engang internet-eksponerede ressourcer, hvilket efterlader teamet frustreret og overvældet af omfanget og den tilsyneladende hastende karakter af det hele. Cloud-sikkerhed er kompliceret.

Khul Anwar Khul Anwar ·
Ready to validate what matters?

Ready to validate what matters?

Plexicus is Proof-Driven AppSec: validated findings, contextual understanding, and reviewed remediation — anchored in evidence, scoped with you.

Qualification

Check whether AI Swarm Pentest fits your environment.

Share the minimum context. We will review the scope and tell you the next commercial step.

Before submitting — verify you fit

Teams with fewer than 50 developers: start a 14-day Trial instead of booking a demo. Start a 14-day Trial →

0 / 280

No commitment. If you don't fit, we'll tell you.

SAMPLE HANDOVER · ILLUSTRATIVE

Sample evidence handover

A trimmed view of what your team receives at the end of an AI Swarm Pentest engagement. Real engagements include full technical evidence, executive narrative, and a remediation plan.

VALIDATED FINDING Evidence attached

Server-Side Request Forgery in webhooks/receiver

demo-project/sample-app · src/webhooks/receiver.py:42

SeverityHigh CVSS 3.18.6 Priority79 Confirmedvia replay

Untrusted caller-supplied URLs reach an internal egress without an allowlist. Replayed in a sandbox against a fresh authorised target — the same control was validated to fail twice.

REVIEWER-READY REMEDIATION Merge-ready PR

Validate the target URL against an allowlist of permitted hostnames. Reject private/internal IP ranges. Enforce HTTPS only.

plexicus/remediation/webhooks-ssrf 3 changed · 0 new files
42resp = requests.get(target_url)
42+if not is_allowed_host(target_url):
43+  raise WebhookRejected(target_url)
44+resp = requests.get(target_url, timeout=5)
Every engagement hands over:
  • Executive briefing
  • Validated findings list
  • Merge-ready PRs
  • Compliance mapping (NIS2 · DORA · CRA)