Use known techniques for prompt injection and other attacks, and adjust the attacks to be more specific to the model or system.
Improper Validation of Generative AI Output
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a generative AI model (like an LLM) but fails to properly check the AI's output before using it. Without this validation, the AI's responses might…
What is CWE-1426?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1426
-
chain: GUI for ChatGPT API performs input validation but does not properly "sanitize" or validate model output data (CWE-1426), leading to XSS (CWE-79).
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE hat kein Codebeispiel für diese CWE veröffentlicht. Das untenstehende Muster ist illustrativ — kanonische Referenzen findest du unter Ressourcen.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1426
- Architecture and Design Since the output from a generative AI component (such as an LLM) cannot be trusted, ensure that it operates in an untrusted or non-privileged space.
- Operation Use "semantic comparators," which are mechanisms that provide semantic comparison to identify objects that might appear different but are semantically similar.
- Operation Use components that operate externally to the system to monitor the output and act as a moderator. These components are called different terms, such as supervisors or guardrails.
- Build and Compilation During model training, use an appropriate variety of good and bad examples to guide preferred outputs.
How to detect CWE-1426
Use known techniques for prompt injection and other attacks, and adjust the attacks to be more specific to the model or system.
Review of the product design can be effective, but it works best in conjunction with dynamic analysis.
Plexicus erkennt CWE-1426 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-1426?
This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a generative AI model (like an LLM) but fails to properly check the AI's output before using it. Without this validation, the AI's responses might contain security flaws, harmful content, or data leaks that violate the application's intended policies.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-1426?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-1426 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Architecture-Specific, AI/ML, Not Technology-Specific.
Wie kann ich CWE-1426 verhindern?
Since the output from a generative AI component (such as an LLM) cannot be trusted, ensure that it operates in an untrusted or non-privileged space. Use "semantic comparators," which are mechanisms that provide semantic comparison to identify objects that might appear different but are semantically similar.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-1426?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-1426 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-1426?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1426.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1426
Improper Neutralization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or sanitize structured data before it's received from an external…
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
This vulnerability occurs when an application builds a structured message—like a query, command, or request—for another component but…
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly sanitize special characters or syntax that have…
Improper Null Termination
This weakness occurs when software fails to properly end a string or array with the required null character or equivalent terminator.
Encoding Error
This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly transforms data between different formats, leading to corrupted or misinterpreted…
Collapse of Data into Unsafe Value
This vulnerability occurs when an application's data filtering or transformation process incorrectly merges or simplifies information,…
Improper Input Validation
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts data from an external source but fails to properly verify that the data is safe and…
Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly reject or process input that doesn't follow the expected format or structure,…
Improper Handling of Inconsistent Structural Elements
This vulnerability occurs when a system fails to properly manage situations where related data structures or elements should match but are…
Further reading
- MITRE — offizielle CWE-1426 https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1426.html
- LLM02: Insecure Output Handling https://genai.owasp.org/llmrisk/llm02-insecure-output-handling/
- Validating Outputs https://cohere.com/blog/validating-llm-outputs
- NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Rails https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-demo.40/
- Insecure output handling in LLMs https://learn.snyk.io/lesson/insecure-input-handling/
- Building Guardrails for Large Language Models https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.01822
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.