Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Private Data Structure Returned From A Public Method
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and…
What is CWE-495?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-495
Bisher sind in MITREs Katalog keine öffentlichen CVE-Referenzen mit dieser CWE verknüpft.
Angreiferpfad Schritt für Schritt
- 1
Identifiziere einen Codepfad, der nicht vertrauenswürdige Eingaben ohne Validierung verarbeitet.
- 2
Erzeuge eine Payload, die das unsichere Verhalten auslöst — Injection, Traversal, Overflow oder Logik-Missbrauch.
- 3
Liefere die Payload über einen normalen Request aus und beobachte die Reaktion der Anwendung.
- 4
Iteriere, bis die Antwort Daten preisgibt, Angreifer-Code ausführt oder Berechtigungen eskaliert.
Vulnerable Java
Here, a public method in a Java class returns a reference to a private array. Given that arrays in Java are mutable, any modifications made to the returned reference would be reflected in the original private array.
private String[] colors;
public String[] getColors() {
return colors;
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-495
- Implementation Declare the method private.
- Implementation Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
- Implementation Use public setter methods that govern how a private member can be modified.
How to detect CWE-495
Plexicus erkennt CWE-495 automatisch und öffnet in unter 60 Sekunden einen Fix-PR.
Codex Remedium scannt jeden Commit, identifiziert genau diese Schwachstelle und liefert einen reviewer-ready Pull Request mit dem Patch. Keine Tickets. Keine Hand-offs.
Frequently asked questions
Was ist CWE-495?
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and modify the data unexpectedly, corrupting the application's state.
Wie gravierend ist CWE-495?
MITRE hat für diese Schwachstelle keine Exploit-Wahrscheinlichkeit veröffentlicht. Behandle sie als mittlere Auswirkung, bis dein Threat Model anderes belegt.
Welche Sprachen oder Plattformen sind von CWE-495 betroffen?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++, Java, C#.
Wie kann ich CWE-495 verhindern?
Declare the method private. Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
Wie erkennt und behebt Plexicus CWE-495?
Die SAST-Engine von Plexicus erkennt die Datenfluss-Signatur von CWE-495 bei jedem Commit. Bei einem Treffer öffnet unser Codex-Remedium-Agent einen Fix-PR mit korrigiertem Code, Tests und einer einzeiligen Zusammenfassung für den Reviewer.
Wo erfahre ich mehr über CWE-495?
MITRE veröffentlicht die kanonische Definition unter https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html. Für ergänzende Hinweise kannst du auch die OWASP- und NIST-Dokumentation heranziehen.
Weaknesses related to CWE-495
Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…
Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…
Creation of Emergent Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…
Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State
This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…
Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable
This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.
Information Loss or Omission
This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…
Incomplete Internal State Distinction
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…
Further reading
- MITRE — offizielle CWE-495 https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Schluss mit dem Bezahlen pro Entwickler.
Schließ den Kreislauf.
Plexicus ist die KI-native ASPM, die scannt, filtert, fixt, pentestet und erklärt — autonom. Unbegrenzte Entwickler, unbegrenzte Repos, Fair-Use-KI-Aktionen. Echter kostenloser Tarif, €269/mo jährlich, wenn du bereit bist.