Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.
Improper Neutralization of Delimiters
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly handle or sanitize delimiter characters within data inputs, allowing them to be misinterpreted by downstream systems.
What is CWE-140?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-140
-
Attacker inserts field separator into input to specify admin privileges.
-
Multiple internal space, insufficient quoting - program does not use proper delimiter between values.
-
Attacker inserts carriage returns and "|" field separator characters to add new user/privileges.
-
Linebreak in field of PHP script allows admin privileges when written to data file.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.
- 2
Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.
- 3
Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.
- 4
Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-140
- Implementation Developers should anticipate that delimiters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system.
- Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
- Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or white space). If some special characters are still needed, such as white space, wrap each argument in quotes after the escaping/filtering step. Be careful of argument injection (CWE-88).
- Implementation Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180). Make sure that the application does not decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist validation schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked.
How to detect CWE-140
Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.
Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.
Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-140 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-140 ?
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly handle or sanitize delimiter characters within data inputs, allowing them to be misinterpreted by downstream systems.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-140 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-140 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-140 ?
Developers should anticipate that delimiters will be injected/removed/manipulated in the input vectors of their product. Use an appropriate combination of denylists and allowlists to ensure only valid, expected and appropriate input is processed by the system. Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or…
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-140 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-140 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-140 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/140.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-140
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly sanitize special characters or syntax that have…
Improper Neutralization of Input Terminators
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts external input but fails to properly handle special characters that downstream…
Improper Neutralization of Input Leaders
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or handle input that begins with special control characters or…
Improper Neutralization of Quoting Syntax
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly validate or escape quote characters (like single ' or double " quotes) in…
Improper Neutralization of Escape, Meta, or Control Sequences
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special character sequences in user-supplied input…
Improper Neutralization of Comment Delimiters
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input and fails to properly sanitize characters that can be interpreted as…
Improper Neutralization of Macro Symbols
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input containing macro symbols (like those used in templates or configuration…
Improper Neutralization of Substitution Characters
This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts user input and fails to properly sanitize special characters that can trigger…
Improper Neutralization of Variable Name Delimiters
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize or escape special characters that act as delimiters for variable…
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.