CWE-226 Base Brouillon

Sensitive Information in Resource Not Removed Before Reuse

This vulnerability occurs when a system releases a resource like memory or a file for reuse but fails to erase the sensitive data it previously contained. The old information remains accessible when…

Définition

What is CWE-226?

This vulnerability occurs when a system releases a resource like memory or a file for reuse but fails to erase the sensitive data it previously contained. The old information remains accessible when the resource is allocated to a new process or used in a different context.
When an operating system or application frees resources—such as deallocating memory or deleting a file—it typically doesn't automatically wipe the stored data for performance reasons. This leftover information can then be exposed if the resource is reused by another part of the system or a different user. The risk also appears within the same process, like when new variable-length data doesn't fully overwrite older, larger data, leaving remnants in memory structures or on disk. This flaw extends to hardware states, such as transitions between power, sleep, or debug modes, where residual data might leak across privilege boundaries. Proactively clearing sensitive data before reuse is a key defense. While SAST tools can detect these patterns, Plexicus uses AI to not only identify the issue but also generate the specific code fixes—like zeroizing memory or securely wiping files—saving significant manual remediation effort across your application portfolio.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-226

  • Cryptography library does not clear heap memory before release

  • Ethernet NIC drivers do not pad frames with null bytes, leading to infoleak from malformed packets.

  • router does not clear information from DHCP packets that have been previously used

  • Products do not fully clear memory buffers when less data is stored into the buffer than previous.

  • Products do not fully clear memory buffers when less data is stored into the buffer than previous.

  • Products do not fully clear memory buffers when less data is stored into the buffer than previous.

  • Product does not clear a data structure before writing to part of it, yielding information leak of previously used memory.

  • Memory not properly cleared before reuse.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    This example shows how an attacker can take advantage of an incorrect state transition.

  2. 2

    Suppose a device is transitioning from state A to state B. During state A, it can read certain private keys from the hidden fuses that are only accessible in state A but not in state B. The device reads the keys, performs operations using those keys, then transitions to state B, where those private keys should no longer be accessible.

  3. 3

    After the transition to state B, even though the private keys are no longer accessible directly from the fuses in state B, they can be accessed indirectly by reading the memory that contains the private keys.

  4. 4

    The following code calls realloc() on a buffer containing sensitive data:

  5. 5

    There is an attempt to scrub the sensitive data from memory, but realloc() is used, so it could return a pointer to a different part of memory. The memory that was originally allocated for cleartext_buffer could still contain an uncleared copy of the data.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Other

Suppose a device is transitioning from state A to state B. During state A, it can read certain private keys from the hidden fuses that are only accessible in state A but not in state B. The device reads the keys, performs operations using those keys, then transitions to state B, where those private keys should no longer be accessible.

Vulnérable Other
During the transition from A to B, the device does not scrub the memory.
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure Other

After the transition to state B, even though the private keys are no longer accessible directly from the fuses in state B, they can be accessed indirectly by reading the memory that contains the private keys.

Sécurisé Other
For transition from state A to state B, remove information which should not be available once the transition is complete.
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-226

  • Architecture and Design / Implementation During critical state transitions, information not needed in the next state should be removed or overwritten with fixed patterns (such as all 0's) or random data, before the transition to the next state.
  • Architecture and Design / Implementation When releasing, de-allocating, or deleting a resource, overwrite its data and relevant metadata with fixed patterns or random data. Be cautious about complex resource types whose underlying representation might be non-contiguous or change at a low level, such as how a file might be split into different chunks on a file system, even though "logical" file positions are contiguous at the application layer. Such resource types might require invocation of special modes or APIs to tell the underlying operating system to perform the necessary clearing, such as SDelete (Secure Delete) on Windows, although the appropriate functionality might not be available at the application layer.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-226

Manual Analysis High

Write a known pattern into each sensitive location. Trigger the release of the resource or cause the desired state transition to occur. Read data back from the sensitive locations. If the reads are successful, and the data is the same as the pattern that was originally written, the test fails and the product needs to be fixed. Note that this test can likely be automated.

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-226 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-226 ?

This vulnerability occurs when a system releases a resource like memory or a file for reuse but fails to erase the sensitive data it previously contained. The old information remains accessible when the resource is allocated to a new process or used in a different context.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-226 ?

MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-226 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Technology-Specific.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-226 ?

During critical state transitions, information not needed in the next state should be removed or overwritten with fixed patterns (such as all 0's) or random data, before the transition to the next state. When releasing, de-allocating, or deleting a resource, overwrite its data and relevant metadata with fixed patterns or random data. Be cautious about complex resource types whose underlying representation might be non-contiguous or change at a low level, such as how a file might be split into…

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-226 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-226 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-226 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/226.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-226

CWE-459 Parent

Incomplete Cleanup

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly remove temporary files, data structures, or system resources after they…

CWE-460 Frère

Improper Cleanup on Thrown Exception

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly restore its state or release resources after an exception is thrown, leaving…

CWE-568 Frère

finalize() Method Without super.finalize()

This vulnerability occurs when a Java class overrides the finalize() method but fails to call super.finalize() within it.

CWE-201 Peut précéder

Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data

This vulnerability occurs when an application sends data to an external party, but accidentally includes sensitive information—like…

CWE-1239 Enfant

Improper Zeroization of Hardware Register

This vulnerability occurs when a hardware component fails to properly erase sensitive data from its internal registers before a new user…

CWE-1272 Enfant

Sensitive Information Uncleared Before Debug/Power State Transition

This vulnerability occurs when a device changes its power mode or enters a debug state but fails to wipe sensitive data that should become…

CWE-1301 Enfant

Insufficient or Incomplete Data Removal within Hardware Component

The product's data removal process fails to completely erase all data from hardware components, potentially leaving sensitive information…

CWE-1342 Enfant

Information Exposure through Microarchitectural State after Transient Execution

This vulnerability occurs when a CPU fails to completely erase temporary data traces left behind by speculative execution or error…

CWE-244 Enfant

Improper Clearing of Heap Memory Before Release ('Heap Inspection')

Using realloc() to resize buffers containing secrets like passwords or keys can leave that sensitive data exposed in memory, as the…

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.