Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.
Inaccurate Comments
This weakness occurs when code comments do not correctly describe or explain the actual behavior of the associated code. Misleading comments create a disconnect between what the documentation says…
What is CWE-1116?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1116
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
In the following Java example the code performs a calculation to determine how much medicine to administer. A comment is provided to give insight into what the calculation shoud be doing. Unfortunately the comment does not match the actual code and thus leaves the reader to wonder which is correct.
- 2
In the correction below, the code functionality has been verified, and the comment has been corrected to reflect the proper calculation.
- 3
Note that in real-world code, these values should be validated to disallow negative numbers, prevent integer overflow, etc.
Vulnerable Java
In the following Java example the code performs a calculation to determine how much medicine to administer. A comment is provided to give insight into what the calculation shoud be doing. Unfortunately the comment does not match the actual code and thus leaves the reader to wonder which is correct.
public class Main {
```
public static void main(String[] args) {
int pt_weight = 83;
int mg_per_kg = 3;
int daily_dose = 0;
// Add the patient weight and Mg/Kg to calculate the correct daily dose
daily_dose = pt_weight * mg_per_kg;
return dosage;
}
} Secure Java
In the correction below, the code functionality has been verified, and the comment has been corrected to reflect the proper calculation.
public class Main {
```
public static void main(String[] args) {
int pt_weight = 83;
int mg_per_kg = 3;
int daily_dose = 0;
// Multiply the patient weight and Mg/Kg to calculate the correct daily dose
daily_dose = pt_weight * mg_per_kg;
return dosage;
}
} How to prevent CWE-1116
- Implementation Verify that each comment accurately reflects what is intended to happen during execution of the code.
How to detect CWE-1116
Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.
Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.
Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-1116 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-1116?
This weakness occurs when code comments do not correctly describe or explain the actual behavior of the associated code. Misleading comments create a disconnect between what the documentation says and what the program actually does.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-1116?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-1116?
A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-1116?
Verify that each comment accurately reflects what is intended to happen during execution of the code.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-1116?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-1116 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-1116?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1116.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1116
Inappropriate Source Code Style or Formatting
This weakness occurs when source code violates established style guidelines for formatting, indentation, whitespace, or commenting, making…
Invokable Control Element with Excessive Volume of Commented-out Code
This weakness occurs when a callable function, method, or procedure contains a large amount of inactive, commented-out code within its…
Inconsistent Naming Conventions for Identifiers
This weakness occurs when a codebase uses mixed naming styles for elements like variables, functions, data types, or files, creating an…
Insufficient Use of Symbolic Constants
This weakness occurs when developers embed raw numbers or text strings directly in code instead of using named symbolic constants, making…
Insufficient Isolation of Symbolic Constant Definitions
This weakness occurs when a codebase uses symbolic constants (like named values for numbers or strings) but scatters their definitions…
Use of Same Variable for Multiple Purposes
This weakness occurs when a single variable is reused to handle multiple, unrelated tasks or to store different pieces of data throughout…
Inappropriate Comment Style
This weakness occurs when source code comments are written in a style or format that doesn't match the project's established standards or…
Inappropriate Whitespace Style
This weakness occurs when source code uses inconsistent or non-standard whitespace formatting, such as irregular indentation, spacing, or…
Source Code Element without Standard Prologue
This weakness occurs when source code files or modules lack a consistent, standardized header or prologue that the development team has…
Further reading
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.