Fuzz testing (fuzzing) is a powerful technique for generating large numbers of diverse inputs - either randomly or algorithmically - and dynamically invoking the code with those inputs. Even with random inputs, it is often capable of generating unexpected results such as crashes, memory corruption, or resource consumption. Fuzzing effectively produces repeatable test cases that clearly indicate bugs, which helps developers to diagnose the issues.
Stack-based Buffer Overflow
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the call stack than it can hold, corrupting adjacent memory and potentially hijacking the program's…
What is CWE-121?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-121
-
Stack-based buffer overflows in SFK for wifi chipset used for IoT/embedded devices, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
- 2
The buffer size is fixed, but there is no guarantee the string in argv[1] will not exceed this size and cause an overflow.
- 3
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
- 4
This function allocates a buffer of 64 bytes to store the hostname, however there is no guarantee that the hostname will not be larger than 64 bytes. If an attacker specifies an address which resolves to a very large hostname, then the function may overwrite sensitive data or even relinquish control flow to the attacker.
- 5
Note that this example also contains an unchecked return value (CWE-252) that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476).
Vulnerable C
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
char buf[BUFSIZE];
strcpy(buf, argv[1]);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-121
- Operation / Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail.
- Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
- Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
- Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
- Operation / Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported modules may be similarly realigned if their default memory addresses conflict with other modules, in a process known as "rebasing" (for Windows) and "prelinking" (for Linux) [REF-1332] using randomly generated addresses. ASLR for libraries cannot be used in conjunction with prelink since it would require relocating the libraries at run-time, defeating the whole purpose of prelinking. For more information on these techniques see D3-SAOR (Segment Address Offset Randomization) from D3FEND [REF-1335].
How to detect CWE-121
Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-121 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-121?
A stack-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a buffer located on the call stack than it can hold, corrupting adjacent memory and potentially hijacking the program's execution flow.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-121?
A MITRE classifica a probabilidade de exploração como Alta — esta fraqueza é ativamente explorada em campo e deve ser priorizada para remediação.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-121?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-121?
Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses canary-based detection in detail. Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a…
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-121?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-121 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-121?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-121
Access of Memory Location After End of Buffer
This vulnerability occurs when software attempts to read from or write to a memory buffer using an index or pointer that points past the…
Heap-based Buffer Overflow
A heap-based buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer allocated in the heap than it can hold, corrupting…
Buffer Over-read
This vulnerability occurs when a program reads data from a memory buffer using an index or pointer that points beyond the buffer's…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-121 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/121.html
- Smashing The Stack For Fun And Profit https://phrack.org/issues/49/14.html
- Writing Secure Code https://www.microsoftpressstore.com/store/writing-secure-code-9780735617223
- The CLASP Application Security Process https://cwe.mitre.org/documents/sources/TheCLASPApplicationSecurityProcess.pdf
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.