For software, use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools, which automatically analyze products to identify third-party dependencies. Often, SCA tools can be used to link with known vulnerabilities in the dependencies that they detect. There are commercial and open-source alternatives, such as OWASP Dependency-Check [REF-1312]. Many languages or frameworks have package managers with similar capabilities, such as npm audit for JavaScript, pip-audit for Python, govulncheck for Go, and many others. Dynamic methods can detect loading of third-party components.
Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
What is CWE-1395?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1395
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.
- 2
Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.
- 3
Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.
- 4
Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.
Vulnerable pseudo
A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1395
- Requirements / Policy In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed.
- Requirements Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, require a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) [REF-1247] [REF-1311].
- Architecture and Design / Implementation / Integration / Manufacturing Maintain a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). According to [REF-1247], "An SBOM is a formal, machine-readable inventory of software components and dependencies, information about those components, and their hierarchical relationships."
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Actively monitor when a third-party component vendor announces vulnerability patches; fix the third-party component as soon as possible; and make it easy for operators/customers to obtain and apply the patch.
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Continuously monitor changes in each of the product's components, especially when the changes indicate new vulnerabilities, end-of-life (EOL) plans, etc.
How to detect CWE-1395
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-1395 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-1395?
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-1395?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-1395?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-1395?
In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed. Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For…
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-1395?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-1395 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-1395?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1395
Violation of Secure Design Principles
This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…
Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)
This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…
Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…
Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')
This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate…
Not Using Complete Mediation
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security…
Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision
This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…
Insufficient Psychological Acceptability
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-1395 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html
- The Unfortunate Reality of Insecure Libraries https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components https://owasp.org/Top10/A06_2021-Vulnerable_and_Outdated_Components/
- Framing Software Component Transparency: Establishing a Common Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_sbom_framing_2nd_edition_20211021.pdf
- The Cases for Using the SBOMs We Build https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AC_SBOM_IB_v2-002.pdf
- OWASP Dependency-Check https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- ICS Alert (ICS-ALERT-20-063-01): SweynTooth Vulnerabilities https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-20-063-01
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.