CWE-183 Base Rascunho

Permissive List of Allowed Inputs

This vulnerability occurs when an application's security filter uses an allowlist that is too broad, mistakenly permitting dangerous inputs that should have been blocked. The flawed assumption that…

Definição

What is CWE-183?

This vulnerability occurs when an application's security filter uses an allowlist that is too broad, mistakenly permitting dangerous inputs that should have been blocked. The flawed assumption that everything on the list is safe creates a direct path for attackers to exploit the system.
An overly permissive allowlist is like a faulty bouncer at a club's door—it lets in troublemakers because the guest list isn't specific enough. Developers often create these lists to validate data like filenames, URLs, or user roles, but if the criteria are vague (e.g., allowing all files with a '.pdf' extension without checking the actual content), attackers can slip malicious payloads through. This bypasses the primary defense, leading to issues like command injection, path traversal, or cross-site scripting. Preventing this requires strict, context-aware validation rules that go beyond simple pattern matching. You must understand the exact, legitimate data your feature needs and deny everything else by default. Managing this at scale across hundreds of APIs and filters is difficult; an ASPM like Plexicus can help you track and remediate these flawed allowlist policies across your entire application stack, ensuring your validation logic is consistently robust.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-183

  • chain: bypass of untrusted deserialization issue (CWE-502) by using an assumed-trusted class (CWE-183)

  • sandbox bypass using a method that is on an allowlist

  • sandbox bypass using unsafe methods that are on an allowlist

  • CI/CD pipeline feature has unsafe elements in allowlist, allowing bypass of script restrictions

  • Default allowlist includes unsafe methods, allowing bypass of sandbox

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable pseudo

A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.

Vulnerável pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-183

  • Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
  • Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
  • Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
  • Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
  • Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-183

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-183 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-183?

This vulnerability occurs when an application's security filter uses an allowlist that is too broad, mistakenly permitting dangerous inputs that should have been blocked. The flawed assumption that everything on the list is safe creates a direct path for attackers to exploit the system.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-183?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-183?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-183?

Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-183?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-183 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-183?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/183.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-183

CWE-697 Pai

Incorrect Comparison

This weakness occurs when a security-critical decision relies on a flawed comparison between two pieces of data. The incorrect logic can…

CWE-1023 Irmão

Incomplete Comparison with Missing Factors

This weakness occurs when a program compares two items but fails to check all the necessary attributes that define their true…

CWE-1024 Irmão

Comparison of Incompatible Types

This vulnerability occurs when code directly compares two values of fundamentally different data types, which can lead to unreliable or…

CWE-1025 Irmão

Comparison Using Wrong Factors

This weakness occurs when a program compares two items but checks the wrong properties or attributes. This flawed comparison leads to…

CWE-1039 Irmão

Inadequate Detection or Handling of Adversarial Input Perturbations in Automated Recognition Mechanism

This vulnerability occurs when a system uses automated AI or machine learning to classify complex inputs like images, audio, or text, but…

CWE-1077 Irmão

Floating Point Comparison with Incorrect Operator

This vulnerability occurs when code compares two floating-point numbers using direct equality operators (like == or !=) without accounting…

CWE-1254 Irmão

Incorrect Comparison Logic Granularity

This vulnerability occurs when a system compares sensitive data, like passwords or authentication tokens, piece-by-piece instead of as a…

CWE-185 Irmão

Incorrect Regular Expression

This vulnerability occurs when a regular expression is written incorrectly, causing it to match or validate data in unintended and…

CWE-581 Irmão

Object Model Violation: Just One of Equals and Hashcode Defined

This vulnerability occurs when a Java class defines either the equals() method or the hashCode() method, but not both, breaking a…

Pronto quando você estiver

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.