CWE-486 Variante Rascunho High likelihood

Comparison of Classes by Name

Definição

What is CWE-486?

This vulnerability occurs when an application determines an object's trustworthiness or behavior solely by checking its class name. Since multiple classes can share identical names across different packages or classloaders, this comparison can lead to using the wrong, potentially malicious, class.

Relying on class name strings for security decisions is inherently risky. Attackers can craft classes with names identical to your trusted ones, tricking your application into granting them unauthorized privileges or executing unintended code paths. This is especially problematic in environments with multiple classloaders, like application servers, where the same fully-qualified name can point to completely different implementations. Detecting these logical flaws manually is challenging, as they depend on runtime context. While SAST tools can flag dangerous comparison patterns, Plexicus uses AI to not only identify the risk but also suggest specific, secure refactoring—such as using direct class object comparisons or verifying the classloader—saving significant manual review time and preventing impersonation attacks.

Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-486

Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

1
In this example, the expression in the if statement compares the class of the inputClass object to a trusted class by comparing the class names.
2
However, multiple classes can have the same name therefore comparing an object's class by name can allow untrusted classes of the same name as the trusted class to be use to execute unintended or incorrect code. To compare the class of an object to the intended class the getClass() method and the comparison operator "==" should be used to ensure the correct trusted class is used, as shown in the following example.
3
In this example, the Java class, TrustedClass, overrides the equals method of the parent class Object to determine equivalence of objects of the class. The overridden equals method first determines if the object, obj, is the same class as the TrustedClass object and then compares the object's fields to determine if the objects are equivalent.
4
However, the equals method compares the class names of the object, obj, and the TrustedClass object to determine if they are the same class. As with the previous example using the name of the class to compare the class of objects can lead to the execution of unintended or incorrect code if the object passed to the equals method is of another class with the same name. To compare the class of an object to the intended class, the getClass() method and the comparison operator "==" should be used to ensure the correct trusted class is used, as shown in the following example.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable Java

In this example, the expression in the if statement compares the class of the inputClass object to a trusted class by comparing the class names.

Vulnerável Java

if (inputClass.getClass().getName().equals("TrustedClassName")) {
```
// Do something assuming you trust inputClass* 
  		
  		
  		 *// ...* 
  		}

Exemplo de código seguro

Secure Java

However, multiple classes can have the same name therefore comparing an object's class by name can allow untrusted classes of the same name as the trusted class to be use to execute unintended or incorrect code. To compare the class of an object to the intended class the getClass() method and the comparison operator "==" should be used to ensure the correct trusted class is used, as shown in the following example.

Seguro Java

if (inputClass.getClass() == TrustedClass.class) {
```
// Do something assuming you trust inputClass* 
  		
  		
  		 *// ...* 
  		}

What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.

Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-486

Implementation Use class equivalency to determine type. Rather than use the class name to determine if an object is of a given type, use the getClass() method, and == operator.

Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-486

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-486 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Obter uma demonstração Experimente o Plexicus gratuitamente

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-486?

Qual a gravidade do CWE-486?

A MITRE classifica a probabilidade de exploração como Alta — esta fraqueza é ativamente explorada em campo e deve ser priorizada para remediação.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-486?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Java.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-486?

Use class equivalency to determine type. Rather than use the class name to determine if an object is of a given type, use the getClass() method, and == operator.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-486?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-486 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-486?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/486.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-486

CWE-1025 Pai

Comparison Using Wrong Factors

This weakness occurs when a program compares two items but checks the wrong properties or attributes. This flawed comparison leads to…

CWE-595 Irmão

Comparison of Object References Instead of Object Contents

This vulnerability occurs when code incorrectly checks if two object references point to the same memory location, rather than comparing…

Recursos

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.

Começar grátis Reservar uma demo