Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Expression is Always True
This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that will always evaluate to 'true', making the check ineffective and potentially bypassing critical security or logic gates.
What is CWE-571?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-571
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.
- 2
Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.
- 3
Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.
- 4
Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.
Vulnerable Java
In the following Java example the updateInventory() method used within an e-business product ordering/inventory application will check if the input product number is in the store or in the warehouse. If the product is found, the method will update the store or warehouse database as well as the aggregate product database. If the product is not found, the method intends to do some special processing without updating any database.
public void updateInventory(String productNumber) {
boolean isProductAvailable = false;
boolean isDelayed = false;
if (productInStore(productNumber)) {
isProductAvailable = true;
updateInStoreDatabase(productNumber);
}
else if (productInWarehouse(productNumber)) {
isProductAvailable = true;
updateInWarehouseDatabase(productNumber);
}
else {
isProductAvailable = true;
}
if ( isProductAvailable ) {
updateProductDatabase(productNumber);
}
else if ( isDelayed ) {
```
/* Warn customer about delay before order processing */*
...}} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-571
- Testing Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.
How to detect CWE-571
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-571 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-571?
This vulnerability occurs when code contains a conditional expression that will always evaluate to 'true', making the check ineffective and potentially bypassing critical security or logic gates.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-571?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-571?
A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-571?
Use Static Analysis tools to spot such conditions.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-571?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-571 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-571?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/571.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-571
Improper Adherence to Coding Standards
This weakness occurs when developers don't consistently follow established coding standards and best practices, which can introduce…
Use of Redundant Code
This weakness occurs when a codebase contains identical or nearly identical logic duplicated across multiple functions, methods, or…
Architecture with Number of Horizontal Layers Outside of Expected Range
This occurs when a software system is built with either too many or too few distinct architectural layers, falling outside a recommended…
Invokable Control Element with Large Number of Outward Calls
This weakness occurs when a single function, method, or callable code block makes an excessively high number of calls to other objects or…
Insufficient Technical Documentation
This weakness occurs when a software or hardware product lacks comprehensive technical documentation. Missing or incomplete details about…
Insufficient Encapsulation
This weakness occurs when a software component exposes too much of its internal workings, such as data structures or implementation logic.…
Runtime Resource Management Control Element in a Component Built to Run on Application Servers
This weakness occurs when an application built to run on a managed application server bypasses the server's high-level APIs and instead…
Missing Serialization Control Element
This weakness occurs when a class or data structure is marked as serializable but lacks the required control methods to properly handle…
Inconsistency Between Implementation and Documented Design
This weakness occurs when the actual code implementation deviates from the intended design described in its official documentation,…
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.