CWE-84 Variante Rascunho

Improper Neutralization of Encoded URI Schemes in a Web Page

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that contains malicious scripts disguised using encoded URI schemes like `javascript:` or `data:`.

Definição

What is CWE-84?

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that contains malicious scripts disguised using encoded URI schemes like `javascript:` or `data:`.
Attackers can exploit this weakness by injecting encoded URI schemes (e.g., `javascript:%61lert(1)` where `%61` decodes to 'a') into links, form fields, or other inputs. When the application renders this tainted data without proper neutralization, the victim's browser decodes and executes the hidden script, leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. This bypasses basic filters that only look for common, non-encoded patterns. To prevent this, developers must validate and sanitize all user-controlled data before it is reflected in web pages. Use context-aware output encoding libraries specifically designed for URI contexts, and implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) to block inline script execution. Never rely solely on blacklisting specific schemes like `javascript:`; instead, whitelist allowed URL protocols and ensure decoding happens before security checks are applied.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-84

  • Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft Outlook Web Access (OWA) component in Exchange Server 5.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an email message with an encoded javascript: URL ("jav&#X41sc
ript:") in an IMG tag.

  • Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Novell Groupwise WebAccess 6.5 before July 11, 2005 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via an e-mail message with an encoded javascript URI (e.g. "j&#X41vascript" in an IMG tag).

  • Encoded script within BBcode IMG tag.

  • Encoded "javascript" in IMG tag.

  • Encoded "javascript" in IMG tag.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable pseudo

A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.

Vulnerável pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-84

  • Implementation Resolve all URIs to absolute or canonical representations before processing.
  • Implementation Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to validate only fields that are expected to be redisplayed by the site. We often encounter data from the request that is reflected by the application server or the application that the development team did not anticipate. Also, a field that is not currently reflected may be used by a future developer. Therefore, validating ALL parts of the HTTP request is recommended.
  • Implementation Use and specify an output encoding that can be handled by the downstream component that is reading the output. Common encodings include ISO-8859-1, UTF-7, and UTF-8. When an encoding is not specified, a downstream component may choose a different encoding, either by assuming a default encoding or automatically inferring which encoding is being used, which can be erroneous. When the encodings are inconsistent, the downstream component might treat some character or byte sequences as special, even if they are not special in the original encoding. Attackers might then be able to exploit this discrepancy and conduct injection attacks; they even might be able to bypass protection mechanisms that assume the original encoding is also being used by the downstream component. The problem of inconsistent output encodings often arises in web pages. If an encoding is not specified in an HTTP header, web browsers often guess about which encoding is being used. This can open up the browser to subtle XSS attacks.
  • Implementation With Struts, write all data from form beans with the bean's filter attribute set to true.
  • Implementation To help mitigate XSS attacks against the user's session cookie, set the session cookie to be HttpOnly. In browsers that support the HttpOnly feature (such as more recent versions of Internet Explorer and Firefox), this attribute can prevent the user's session cookie from being accessible to malicious client-side scripts that use document.cookie. This is not a complete solution, since HttpOnly is not supported by all browsers. More importantly, XMLHTTPRequest and other powerful browser technologies provide read access to HTTP headers, including the Set-Cookie header in which the HttpOnly flag is set.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-84

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-84 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-84?

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that contains malicious scripts disguised using encoded URI schemes like `javascript:` or `data:`.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-84?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-84?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-84?

Resolve all URIs to absolute or canonical representations before processing. Carefully check each input parameter against a rigorous positive specification (allowlist) defining the specific characters and format allowed. All input should be neutralized, not just parameters that the user is supposed to specify, but all data in the request, including tag attributes, hidden fields, cookies, headers, the URL itself, and so forth. A common mistake that leads to continuing XSS vulnerabilities is to…

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-84?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-84 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-84?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/84.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-84

CWE-79 Pai

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or encode user-supplied input before displaying it on a…

CWE-80 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS)

This vulnerability, commonly known as Basic Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user…

CWE-81 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Script in an Error Message Web Page

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input before displaying it within an error message…

CWE-83 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Script in Attributes in a Web Page

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize or block JavaScript URIs (like 'javascript:') within HTML tag…

CWE-85 Irmão

Doubled Character XSS Manipulations

This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly sanitize user input that contains doubled characters, allowing…

CWE-86 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Invalid Characters in Identifiers in Web Pages

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly filter or escape invalid characters within web identifiers like HTML tag…

CWE-87 Irmão

Improper Neutralization of Alternate XSS Syntax

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input that uses alternative methods to execute…

Pronto quando você estiver

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.