Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource based on user-controlled input, but fails to properly validate or restrict where those requests are sent.…
What is CWE-918?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-918
-
SSRF in LLM application development framework because the URL retriever allows connections to local addresses using a crafted Location header
-
Chain: LLM integration framework has prompt injection (CWE-1427) that allows an attacker to force the service to retrieve data from an arbitrary URL, essentially providing SSRF (CWE-918) and potentially injecting content into downstream tasks.
-
Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in mail server, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Server Side Request Forgery in cloud platform, as exploited in the wild per CISA KEV.
-
Chain: incorrect validation of intended decimal-based IP address format (CWE-1286) enables parsing of octal or hexadecimal formats (CWE-1389), allowing bypass of an SSRF protection mechanism (CWE-918).
-
Web server allows attackers to request a URL from another server, including other ports, which allows proxied scanning.
-
CGI script accepts and retrieves incoming URLs.
-
Web-based mail program allows internal network scanning using a modified POP3 port number.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.
- 2
Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.
- 3
Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.
- 4
Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.
Vulnerable pseudo
A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-918
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-918
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-918 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-918?
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) occurs when a web application fetches a remote resource based on user-controlled input, but fails to properly validate or restrict where those requests are sent. This allows an attacker to trick the server into making unauthorized connections to internal systems or external domains.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-918?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-918?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: AI/ML, Web Server.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-918?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-918?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-918 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-918?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-918
Unintended Proxy or Intermediary ('Confused Deputy')
A confused deputy vulnerability occurs when a system receives a request from a client and forwards it to an external destination without…
Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames
This vulnerability occurs when a web application fails to properly control whether its pages can be embedded within frames or UI layers…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-918 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html
- SSRF vs. Business-critical applications: XXE tunneling in SAP https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-12/Briefings/Polyakov/BH_US_12_Polyakov_SSRF_Business_Slides.pdf
- SSRF vs. Business-critical Applications. Part 1: XXE Tunnelling in SAP NetWeaver http://erpscan.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/SSRF-vs-Businness-critical-applications-whitepaper.pdf
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 1 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-1/
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 2 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-2/
- Cross Site Port Attacks - XSPA - Part 3 https://ibreak.software/2012/11/cross-site-port-attacks-xspa-part-3/
- SSRF attacks and sockets: smorgasbord of vulnerabilities https://www.slideshare.net/DefconRussia/vorontsov-golovko-ssrf-attacks-and-sockets-smorgasbord-of-vulnerabilities
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.