AI-coding benchmarks
A 1,200-PR side-by-side of what Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, and Devin ship into real repos — and how often those PRs introduce a CWE-285, CWE-89, or CWE-22.
A deep look at what AI coding assistants are shipping into production — and the ASPM playbook that catches it. 38 pages of benchmarks, case studies, and remediation patterns.
A 1,200-PR side-by-side of what Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, and Devin ship into real repos — and how often those PRs introduce a CWE-285, CWE-89, or CWE-22.
The four-layer review pattern that catches what AI-generated code misses: graph-aware SAST, reachability analysis, replay-verified findings, and a human-reviewable audit trail.
How three engineering teams cut their AI-coded vulnerability backlog by 78%, 84%, and 91% in one quarter — including the rollout plan they used and the metrics they watched.
A practitioner-grade mapping from AI-coding risks to NIS2 Art. 21, DORA Art. 28, the EU AI Act, and the Cyber Resilience Act — with the evidence each regulator expects.
A board-ready view of what AI coding assistants are shipping into your codebase and the playbook to bring it under control in 90 days.
The benchmarks, reachability patterns, and remediation templates that compress your review backlog without dropping the findings that matter.
How to keep AI-coding velocity high while the audit trail stays auditable — including the IDE- and CI-level guardrails the case-study teams standardised on.
The NIS2 / DORA / EU AI Act / CRA mapping your regulator will ask about, with the evidence artefacts each framework expects.
Free 38-page PDF. No signup wall, no email-gate before the table of contents.