Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.
Hardware Internal or Debug Modes Allow Override of Locks
Hardware debug modes or internal states can bypass critical system lock protections, allowing unauthorized changes to device configuration.
What is CWE-1234?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1234
Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
For example, consider the example Locked_override_register example. This register module supports a lock mode that blocks any writes after lock is set to 1. However, it also allows override of the lock protection when scan_mode or debug_unlocked modes are active.
- 2
If either the scan_mode or the debug_unlocked modes can be triggered by software, then the lock protection may be bypassed.
- 3
The following example code [REF-1375] is taken from the register lock security peripheral of the HACK@DAC'21 buggy OpenPiton SoC. It demonstrates how to lock read or write access to security-critical hardware registers (e.g., crypto keys, system integrity code, etc.). The configuration to lock all the sensitive registers in the SoC is managed through the reglk_mem registers. These reglk_mem registers are reset when the hardware powers up and configured during boot up. Malicious users, even with kernel-level software privilege, do not get access to the sensitive contents that are locked down. Hence, the security of the entire system can potentially be compromised if the register lock configurations are corrupted or if the register locks are disabled.
- 4
The example code [REF-1375] illustrates an instance of a vulnerable implementation of register locks in the SoC. In this flawed implementation [REF-1375], the reglk_mem registers are also being reset when the system enters debug mode (indicated by the jtag_unlock signal). Consequently, users can simply put the processor in debug mode to access sensitive contents that are supposed to be protected by the register lock feature.
- 5
This can be mitigated by excluding debug mode signals from the reset logic of security-critical register locks as demonstrated in the following code snippet [REF-1376].
Vulnerable Verilog
For example, consider the example Locked_override_register example. This register module supports a lock mode that blocks any writes after lock is set to 1. However, it also allows override of the lock protection when scan_mode or debug_unlocked modes are active.
module Locked_register_example
(
input [15:0] Data_in,
input Clk,
input resetn,
input write,
input Lock,
input scan_mode,
input debug_unlocked,
output reg [15:0] Data_out
);
reg lock_status;
always @(posedge Clk or negedge resetn)
```
if (~resetn) // Register is reset resetn
begin
lock_status <= 1'b0;
end
else if (Lock)
begin
lock_status <= 1'b1;
end
else if (~Lock)
begin
lock_status <= lock_status
end
always @(posedge Clk or negedge resetn)
if (~resetn) // Register is reset resetn
begin
Data_out <= 16'h0000;
end
else if (write & (~lock_status | scan_mode | debug_unlocked) ) // Register protected by Lock bit input, overrides supported for scan_mode & debug_unlocked
begin
Data_out <= Data_in;
end
else if (~write)
begin
Data_out <= Data_out;
end
endmodule Secure code
If either the scan_mode or the debug_unlocked modes can be triggered by software, then the lock protection may be bypassed.
Either remove the debug and scan mode overrides or protect enabling of these modes so that only trusted and authorized users may enable these modes. How to prevent CWE-1234
- Architecture and Design / Implementation / Testing - Security Lock bit protections should be reviewed for any bypass/override modes supported. - Any supported override modes either should be removed or protected using authenticated debug modes. - Security lock programming flow and lock properties should be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing.
How to detect CWE-1234
Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.
Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.
Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-1234 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-1234 ?
Hardware debug modes or internal states can bypass critical system lock protections, allowing unauthorized changes to device configuration.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-1234 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-1234 ?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-1234 ?
- Security Lock bit protections should be reviewed for any bypass/override modes supported. - Any supported override modes either should be removed or protected using authenticated debug modes. - Security lock programming flow and lock properties should be tested in pre-silicon and post-silicon testing.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-1234 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-1234 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-1234 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1234.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1234
Improper Locking
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to correctly acquire or release a lock on a shared resource, such as a file, database…
Improper Lock Behavior After Power State Transition
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware lock bit, designed to protect critical system configuration registers, is improperly reset or…
Security-Sensitive Hardware Controls with Missing Lock Bit Protection
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware device uses a lock bit to protect critical configuration registers, but the lock fails to…
Unrestricted Externally Accessible Lock
This vulnerability occurs when a system correctly checks for a lock's existence, but an unauthorized external actor can control or…
Improper Resource Locking
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly lock a shared resource, such as a file or memory location, before…
Missing Lock Check
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify that a proper synchronization lock is active before accessing or modifying a…
Double-Checked Locking
Double-checked locking is an insufficient synchronization pattern where a program checks a resource's state, acquires a lock, and checks…
Multiple Locks of a Critical Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, such as a file, data structure, or connection, is locked more times than the software…
Multiple Unlocks of a Critical Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a critical resource, like a lock or semaphore, is unlocked more times than it was locked, putting the…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-1234 officiel https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1234.html
- reglk_wrapper.sv https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/cde1d9d6888bffab21d4b405ccef61b19c58dd3c/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/reglk/reglk_wrapper.sv#L80C1-L80C48
- Fix for reglk_wrapper.sv https://github.com/HACK-EVENT/hackatdac21/blob/20238068b385d7ab704cabfb95ff95dd6e56e1c2/piton/design/chip/tile/ariane/src/reglk/reglk_wrapper.sv#L80
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.