CWE-59 Base Brouillon Medium likelihood

Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following')

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a filename to access a file but fails to properly check if that name points to a symbolic link, shortcut, or junction. This allows an attacker to…

Définition

What is CWE-59?

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a filename to access a file but fails to properly check if that name points to a symbolic link, shortcut, or junction. This allows an attacker to manipulate the link's target, causing the application to read or write to an unintended, potentially sensitive location.
At its core, this is a path traversal issue enabled by symbolic links. When a program doesn't verify that a file is a regular file and not a link, an attacker can create a link that points outside the intended directory—like a system file or another user's data. The application then blindly follows this link, leading to unauthorized access, data corruption, or a denial of service. To prevent this, developers must explicitly resolve symbolic links before performing file operations. This involves using system calls or functions that return the canonical path of a file, checking the file's type, and implementing proper access controls. Always assume filenames provided by users or external sources are untrusted and validate the final resolved path against a safe allowlist.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-59

  • CVE-1999-1386

    Some versions of Perl follow symbolic links when running with the -e option, which allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack.

  • CVE-2000-1178

    Text editor follows symbolic links when creating a rescue copy during an abnormal exit, which allows local users to overwrite the files of other users.

  • CVE-2004-0217

    Antivirus update allows local users to create or append to arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a logfile.

  • CVE-2003-0517

    Symlink attack allows local users to overwrite files.

  • CVE-2004-0689

    Window manager does not properly handle when certain symbolic links point to "stale" locations, which could allow local users to create or truncate arbitrary files.

  • CVE-2005-1879

    Second-order symlink vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2005-1880

    Second-order symlink vulnerabilities

  • CVE-2005-1916

    Symlink in Python program

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.

  2. 2

    Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.

  3. 3

    Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.

  4. 4

    Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable pseudo

MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.

Vulnérable pseudo 
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-59

  • Architecture and Design Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-59

Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Web Application Scanner Web Services Scanner Database Scanners

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Fuzz Tester Framework-based Fuzzer

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code High

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Highly cost effective: ``` Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code SOAR Partial

According to SOAR [REF-1479], the following detection techniques may be useful: ``` Cost effective for partial coverage: ``` Source code Weakness Analyzer Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-59 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Obtenir une démo Essayer Plexicus gratuitement
Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-59 ?

This vulnerability occurs when an application uses a filename to access a file but fails to properly check if that name points to a symbolic link, shortcut, or junction. This allows an attacker to manipulate the link's target, causing the application to read or write to an unintended, potentially sensitive location.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-59 ?

MITRE évalue la probabilité d'exploitation comme Moyenne — l'exploitation est réaliste mais nécessite généralement des conditions spécifiques.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-59 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Windows, Unix.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-59 ?

Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system. Denying access to a file can prevent an attacker from replacing that file with a link to a sensitive file. Ensure good compartmentalization in the system to provide protected areas that can be trusted.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-59 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-59 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-59 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/59.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-59

CWE-706 Parent

Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or Reference

This vulnerability occurs when software uses a name, path, or reference to access a resource, but that identifier points to something…

CWE-178 Frère

Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to consistently handle uppercase and lowercase letters when checking or accessing resources,…

CWE-22 Frère

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

This vulnerability occurs when an application builds a file path using user input but fails to properly validate it, allowing an attacker…

CWE-386 Frère

Symbolic Name not Mapping to Correct Object

This vulnerability occurs when a program uses a fixed symbolic name (like a constant or identifier) to refer to an object, but that name…

CWE-41 Frère

Improper Resolution of Path Equivalence

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly handle different text representations that refer to the same file or…

CWE-66 Frère

Improper Handling of File Names that Identify Virtual Resources

This vulnerability occurs when software incorrectly processes a filename that points to a 'virtual' resource—like a device, pipe, or…

CWE-827 Frère

Improper Control of Document Type Definition

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly restrict which Document Type Definitions (DTDs) can be referenced during…

CWE-98 Frère

Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion')

This vulnerability occurs when a PHP application uses unvalidated or insufficiently restricted user input directly within file inclusion…

CWE-1386 Enfant

Insecure Operation on Windows Junction / Mount Point

This vulnerability occurs when a Windows application opens a file or directory without properly validating that the path is not a symbolic…

Ressources

Further reading

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.

Commencer gratuitement Réserver une démo