Secrets
In progressResults are not final yet.
AI frameworks · Security report
No alerts flaggedShort answer
Our latest scan found no alerts in the checks that ran. That is a good sign, but not proof of safety: some areas were not checked, and new code can change the picture.
LlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AI
The assessment, at a glance
The current visible findings query returned zero alerts. This does not establish that the project is safe or that all checks ran.
Repository snapshot from Plexicus staging. Counts may include earlier scans and are not attributed to an exact run or commit. Check categories come from the latest observed job and can differ from the scans contributing findings. Completed categories describe bundle delivery, not full repository coverage.
What we found
Alerts are leads for review, sorted by type and severity. They are not confirmed vulnerabilities.
A breakdown by type is not available yet. Severity totals do not show what kind of issues were flagged.
Repository findings snapshot
0automated alerts
Findings currently visible in the Plexicus repository record. These alerts have not been validated as vulnerabilities or attributed to this exact scan or commit.
Source: Plexicus staging · Collected
These are current repository totals, which may include findings from earlier scans. Scan-specific counts and the scanned commit remain unverified. The snapshot excludes findings marked as false positives, duplicates, deleted, or sandbox results, and findings still awaiting processing or enrichment.
Next steps
Practical steps based on what the scan flagged. They are general guidance, not confirmation of an exploitable vulnerability.
Check the evidenced scan scope before relying on the absence of alerts.
Try it in a container or virtual machine first, with throwaway credentials.
Pin a specific release or commit instead of tracking the latest code.
This public report shows totals only. File names, exploitability, and false-positive rates are not included.
What we checked
Each card shows whether the latest scan completed that type of check. A completed check does not mean every file or rule was covered.
Results are not final yet.
Do not assume this area was assessed.
Do not assume this area was assessed.
Do not assume this area was assessed.
Limits
Result bundles: 0 of 1 complete; 0 failed; 0 degraded. Bundle completion alone does not establish full scan coverage.
Requested commit 619d74664e8404612038bc15a1a40c686037277c
Scan source fork: View fork ↗
Repository metadata retrieved 2026-10-15T08:14:31.491Z. Candidate commit from metadata: 619d74664e8404612038bc15a1a40c686037277c. A candidate commit is not proof of the scanned commit.
Our latest scan found no alerts in the checks that ran. That is a good sign, but not proof of safety: some areas were not checked, and new code can change the picture.
The current visible findings query returned zero alerts. This does not establish that the project is safe or that all checks ran.
Runtime behavior, deployment settings, MCP and tool permissions, and prompt injection are not covered unless listed in the checks above. Review those before giving the tool access to real data.
Scan it with the free Plexicus SAST tool. Connect GitHub and get a report for your own repository.
For maintainers
Show users where to find this report. The badge links to this page and makes no safety claim.
[](https://www.plexicus.ai/open-source/run-llama/llama_index/)Your own code
Connect GitHub and see what Plexicus flags in your code.
Scan your repository free ↗