Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.
Observable Discrepancy
This vulnerability occurs when an application responds differently to unauthorized users based on internal conditions. Attackers can observe these variations—like changes in error messages, timing,…
What is CWE-203?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-203
-
Observable discrepancy in the RAPL interface for some Intel processors allows information disclosure.
-
Crypto hardware wallet's power consumption relates to total number of pixels illuminated, creating a side channel in the USB connection that allows attackers to determine secrets displayed such as PIN numbers and passwords
-
Java-oriented framework compares HMAC signatures using String.equals() instead of a constant-time algorithm, causing timing discrepancies
-
This, and others, use ".." attacks and monitor error responses, so there is overlap with directory traversal.
-
Enumeration of valid usernames based on inconsistent responses
-
Account number enumeration via inconsistent responses.
-
User enumeration via discrepancies in error messages.
-
User enumeration via discrepancies in error messages.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
The following code checks validity of the supplied username and password and notifies the user of a successful or failed login.
- 2
In the above code, there are different messages for when an incorrect username is supplied, versus when the username is correct but the password is wrong. This difference enables a potential attacker to understand the state of the login function, and could allow an attacker to discover a valid username by trying different values until the incorrect password message is returned. In essence, this makes it easier for an attacker to obtain half of the necessary authentication credentials.
- 3
While this type of information may be helpful to a user, it is also useful to a potential attacker. In the above example, the message for both failed cases should be the same, such as:
- 4
In this example, the attacker observes how long an authentication takes when the user types in the correct password.
- 5
When the attacker tries their own values, they can first try strings of various length. When they find a string of the right length, the computation will take a bit longer, because the for loop will run at least once. Additionally, with this code, the attacker can possibly learn one character of the password at a time, because when they guess the first character right, the computation will take longer than a wrong guesses. Such an attack can break even the most sophisticated password with a few hundred guesses.
Vulnerable Perl
The following code checks validity of the supplied username and password and notifies the user of a successful or failed login.
my $username=param('username');
my $password=param('password');
if (IsValidUsername($username) == 1)
{
if (IsValidPassword($username, $password) == 1)
{
print "Login Successful";
}
else
{
print "Login Failed - incorrect password";
}
}
else
{
print "Login Failed - unknown username";
} Secure Other
In the example above, an attacker may vary the inputs, then observe differences between processing times (since different plaintexts take different time). This could be used to infer information about the key.
Artificial delays may be added to ensure that all calculations take equal time to execute. How to prevent CWE-203
- Architecture and Design Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
- Implementation Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
How to detect CWE-203
Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.
Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.
Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-203 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-203?
This vulnerability occurs when an application responds differently to unauthorized users based on internal conditions. Attackers can observe these variations—like changes in error messages, timing, or system behavior—to infer sensitive information, such as whether a username exists, a password is incorrect, or a specific operation succeeded.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-203?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-203?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not Technology-Specific.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-203?
Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to…
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-203?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-203 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-203?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/203.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-203
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
This weakness occurs when an application unintentionally reveals sensitive data to someone who shouldn't have access to it.
Exposure of Sensitive System Information Due to Uncleared Debug Information
This vulnerability occurs when hardware fails to erase sensitive data like cryptographic keys and intermediate values before entering…
Device Unlock Credential Sharing
This vulnerability occurs when the secret keys or passwords required to unlock a device's hidden features are shared between multiple…
Debug Messages Revealing Unnecessary Information
The product's debug messages or logs expose excessive internal system details, potentially revealing sensitive information that could aid…
Driving Intermediate Cryptographic State/Results to Hardware Module Outputs
This vulnerability occurs when a hardware cryptographic module leaks sensitive internal data through its output channels. Instead of only…
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data
This vulnerability occurs when an application sends data to an external party, but accidentally includes sensitive information—like…
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
This vulnerability occurs when an application reveals sensitive details about its internal systems, user data, or environment within error…
Exposure of Sensitive Information Due to Incompatible Policies
This vulnerability occurs when a system's data handling aligns with the developer's security rules but accidentally reveals information…
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Debugging Code
This vulnerability occurs when developers embed sensitive data, such as passwords or API keys, within debugging statements like logs or…
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.