Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
J2EE Bad Practices: Direct Management of Connections
This vulnerability occurs when a J2EE application handles database connections directly instead of using the container's built-in connection management system.
What is CWE-245?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-245
Ainda não há referências CVE públicas associadas a este CWE no catálogo da MITRE.
Trajeto do atacante passo a passo
- 1
Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.
- 2
Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.
- 3
Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.
- 4
Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.
Vulnerable Java
In the following example, the class DatabaseConnection opens and manages a connection to a database for a J2EE application. The method openDatabaseConnection opens a connection to the database using a DriverManager to create the Connection object conn to the database specified in the string constant CONNECT_STRING.
public class DatabaseConnection {
private static final String CONNECT_STRING = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mysqldb";
private Connection conn = null;
public DatabaseConnection() {
}
public void openDatabaseConnection() {
try {
conn = DriverManager.getConnection(CONNECT_STRING);
} catch (SQLException ex) {...}
}
// Member functions for retrieving database connection and accessing database
...
} Secure Java
The use of the DriverManager class to directly manage the connection to the database violates the J2EE restriction against the direct management of connections. The J2EE application should use the web application container's resource management facilities to obtain a connection to the database as shown in the following example.
public class DatabaseConnection {
private static final String DB_DATASRC_REF = "jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/mysqldb";
private Connection conn = null;
public DatabaseConnection() {
}
public void openDatabaseConnection() {
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
DataSource datasource = (DataSource) ctx.lookup(DB_DATASRC_REF);
conn = datasource.getConnection();
} catch (NamingException ex) {...}
} catch (SQLException ex) {...}
}
// Member functions for retrieving database connection and accessing database
...
} How to prevent CWE-245
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-245
O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-245 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.
O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.
Frequently asked questions
O que é o CWE-245?
This vulnerability occurs when a J2EE application handles database connections directly instead of using the container's built-in connection management system.
Qual a gravidade do CWE-245?
A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.
Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-245?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Java.
Como posso prevenir o CWE-245?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-245?
O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-245 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.
Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-245?
A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/245.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.
Weaknesses related to CWE-245
Use of Low-Level Functionality
This vulnerability occurs when code bypasses high-level framework controls by directly using low-level system functions, violating the…
Direct Use of Unsafe JNI
This weakness occurs when a Java application directly calls native code through the Java Native Interface (JNI), exposing the entire…
J2EE Bad Practices: Direct Use of Sockets
This vulnerability occurs when a J2EE application creates network sockets directly, bypassing the container-managed communication…
J2EE Bad Practices: Direct Use of Threads
Creating or managing threads directly within a J2EE application is a risky practice that violates the platform's standards and often leads…
EJB Bad Practices: Use of Synchronization Primitives
This vulnerability occurs when an Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) component improperly uses thread synchronization primitives, violating the…
EJB Bad Practices: Use of AWT Swing
This vulnerability occurs when an Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) component incorrectly uses AWT or Swing UI toolkits, violating the EJB…
EJB Bad Practices: Use of Java I/O
This vulnerability occurs when an Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) component incorrectly uses Java I/O (java.io) operations to access the file…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-245 oficial https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/245.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.
O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.