CWE-637 Classe Rascunho

Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')

This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate protection mechanisms are harder to understand, configure, and…

Definição

What is CWE-637?

This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate protection mechanisms are harder to understand, configure, and implement correctly, often leading to security gaps and misconfigurations.
Security controls should follow the principle of 'economy of mechanism'—the simpler they are, the more reliable they become. Complex designs increase the chance of implementation errors, compatibility issues, and mismatches between the intended security model and its real-world deployment. Developers are more likely to correctly implement, test, and maintain straightforward solutions. This principle also applies to data structures and validation logic. Overly complex data specifications force you to write equally complex validation code, which is prone to bugs. Whenever possible, favor simple system architectures and data models, as they naturally require simpler and more robust security checks.
Impacto no mundo real

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-637

  • Support for complex regular expressions leads to a resultant algorithmic complexity weakness (CWE-407).

  • Either a filename extension and a Content-Type header could be used to infer the file type, but the developer only checks the Content-Type, enabling unrestricted file upload (CWE-434).

  • In Apache environments, a "filename.php.gif" can be redirected to the PHP interpreter instead of being sent as an image/gif directly to the user. Not knowing this, the developer only checks the last extension of a submitted filename, enabling arbitrary code execution.

  • The developer cleanses the $_REQUEST superglobal array, but PHP also populates $_GET, allowing attackers to bypass the protection mechanism and conduct SQL injection attacks against code that uses $_GET.

Como os atacantes a exploram

Trajeto do atacante passo a passo

  1. 1

    Identificar um caminho de código que trata input não confiável sem validação.

  2. 2

    Criar um payload que explora o comportamento inseguro — injeção, traversal, overflow ou abuso de lógica.

  3. 3

    Entregar o payload através de um pedido normal e observar a reação da aplicação.

  4. 4

    Iterar até que a resposta exponha dados, execute código do atacante ou escale privilégios.

Exemplo de código vulnerável

Vulnerable pseudo

A MITRE não publicou um exemplo de código para este CWE. O padrão abaixo é ilustrativo — consulte os Recursos para referências canónicas.

Vulnerável pseudo
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
  // Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
  return executeUnsafe(input);
}
Exemplo de código seguro

Secure pseudo

Seguro pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Lista de verificação de prevenção

How to prevent CWE-637

  • Architecture and Design Avoid complex security mechanisms when simpler ones would meet requirements. Avoid complex data models, and unnecessarily complex operations. Adopt architectures that provide guarantees, simplify understanding through elegance and abstraction, and that can be implemented similarly. Modularize, isolate and do not trust complex code, and apply other secure programming principles on these modules (e.g., least privilege) to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Sinais de deteção

How to detect CWE-637

SAST High

Executar análise estática (SAST) na base de código à procura do padrão inseguro no fluxo de dados.

DAST Moderate

Executar testes dinâmicos de segurança de aplicações (DAST) contra o endpoint em execução.

Runtime Moderate

Monitorizar os registos em tempo de execução para traços de exceção invulgares, input malformado ou tentativas de contornar a autorização.

Code review Moderate

Revisão de código: sinalizar qualquer novo código que trate input desta superfície sem usar os ajudantes validados do framework.

Correção automática do Plexicus

O Plexicus deteta automaticamente o CWE-637 e abre um PR de correção em menos de 60 segundos.

O Codex Remedium analisa cada commit, identifica esta fraqueza exata e entrega um pull request pronto para revisão com o patch. Sem tickets. Sem transferências.

Perguntas frequentes

Frequently asked questions

O que é o CWE-637?

This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate protection mechanisms are harder to understand, configure, and implement correctly, often leading to security gaps and misconfigurations.

Qual a gravidade do CWE-637?

A MITRE não publicou uma classificação de probabilidade de exploração para esta fraqueza. Trate-a como impacto médio até o seu modelo de ameaças provar o contrário.

Que linguagens ou plataformas são afetadas pelo CWE-637?

A MITRE não especificou as plataformas afetadas por este CWE — pode aplicar-se à maioria das stacks de aplicações.

Como posso prevenir o CWE-637?

Avoid complex security mechanisms when simpler ones would meet requirements. Avoid complex data models, and unnecessarily complex operations. Adopt architectures that provide guarantees, simplify understanding through elegance and abstraction, and that can be implemented similarly. Modularize, isolate and do not trust complex code, and apply other secure programming principles on these modules (e.g., least privilege) to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Como é que o Plexicus deteta e corrige o CWE-637?

O motor SAST do Plexicus correlaciona a assinatura de fluxo de dados do CWE-637 em cada commit. Quando é encontrada uma correspondência, o nosso agente Codex Remedium abre um PR de correção com o código corrigido, testes e um resumo de uma linha para o revisor.

Onde posso saber mais sobre o CWE-637?

A MITRE publica a definição canónica em https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/637.html. Pode também consultar a documentação da OWASP e do NIST para orientações adjacentes.

Fraquezas relacionadas

Weaknesses related to CWE-637

CWE-657 Pai

Violation of Secure Design Principles

This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…

CWE-1192 Irmão

Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)

This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…

CWE-1395 Irmão

Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component

This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.

CWE-250 Irmão

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…

CWE-636 Irmão

Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')

This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…

CWE-638 Irmão

Not Using Complete Mediation

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…

CWE-653 Irmão

Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security…

CWE-654 Irmão

Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision

This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…

CWE-655 Irmão

Insufficient Psychological Acceptability

This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or…

Pronto quando você estiver

Pare de pagar por desenvolvedor.
Comece a fechar o ciclo.

O Plexicus é o ASPM nativo de IA que verifica, filtra, corrige, pentesta e explica — de forma autónoma. Programadores ilimitados, repos ilimitados, ações de IA de utilização justa. Nível gratuito real, €269/mo anual quando estiver pronto.