For software, use Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools, which automatically analyze products to identify third-party dependencies. Often, SCA tools can be used to link with known vulnerabilities in the dependencies that they detect. There are commercial and open-source alternatives, such as OWASP Dependency-Check [REF-1312]. Many languages or frameworks have package managers with similar capabilities, such as npm audit for JavaScript, pip-audit for Python, govulncheck for Go, and many others. Dynamic methods can detect loading of third-party components.
Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
What is CWE-1395?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-1395
Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.
- 2
Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.
- 3
Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.
- 4
Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.
Vulnerable pseudo
MITRE n'a pas publié d'exemple de code pour ce CWE. Le motif ci-dessous est illustratif — voir Ressources pour les références canoniques.
// Example pattern — see MITRE for the canonical references.
function handleRequest(input) {
// Untrusted input flows directly into the sensitive sink.
return executeUnsafe(input);
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-1395
- Requirements / Policy In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed.
- Requirements Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, require a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) [REF-1247] [REF-1311].
- Architecture and Design / Implementation / Integration / Manufacturing Maintain a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For software, maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). According to [REF-1247], "An SBOM is a formal, machine-readable inventory of software components and dependencies, information about those components, and their hierarchical relationships."
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Actively monitor when a third-party component vendor announces vulnerability patches; fix the third-party component as soon as possible; and make it easy for operators/customers to obtain and apply the patch.
- Operation / Patching and Maintenance Continuously monitor changes in each of the product's components, especially when the changes indicate new vulnerabilities, end-of-life (EOL) plans, etc.
How to detect CWE-1395
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-1395 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-1395 ?
This vulnerability occurs when your software relies on an external library, framework, or module that contains known security flaws.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-1395 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-1395 ?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: Not OS-Specific, Not Architecture-Specific, Not Technology-Specific.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-1395 ?
In some industries such as healthcare [REF-1320] [REF-1322] or technologies such as the cloud [REF-1321], it might be unclear about who is responsible for applying patches for third-party vulnerabilities: the vendor, the operator/customer, or a separate service. Clarifying roles and responsibilities can be important to minimize confusion or unnecessary delay when third-party vulnerabilities are disclosed. Require a Bill of Materials for all components and sub-components of the product. For…
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-1395 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-1395 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-1395 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-1395
Violation of Secure Design Principles
This weakness occurs when a system's architecture or design fails to follow fundamental security principles, creating a flawed foundation…
Improper Identifier for IP Block used in System-On-Chip (SOC)
This weakness occurs when a System-on-Chip (SoC) lacks a secure, unique, and permanent identifier for its internal hardware components (IP…
Execution with Unnecessary Privileges
This vulnerability occurs when software runs with higher permissions than it actually needs to perform its tasks. This excessive privilege…
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
This vulnerability occurs when a system, upon encountering an error or failure, defaults to its least secure configuration instead of a…
Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')
This weakness occurs when a security feature is implemented with excessive complexity, creating unnecessary risk. Overly intricate…
Not Using Complete Mediation
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to verify access permissions every single time a user or process tries to use a resource.…
Improper Isolation or Compartmentalization
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to enforce strong boundaries between components that operate at different security…
Reliance on a Single Factor in a Security Decision
This vulnerability occurs when a system's security check depends almost entirely on just one condition, object, or piece of data to decide…
Insufficient Psychological Acceptability
This weakness occurs when security features are so cumbersome or confusing that well-intentioned users feel forced to turn them off or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-1395 officiel https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1395.html
- The Unfortunate Reality of Insecure Libraries https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- A06:2021 - Vulnerable and Outdated Components https://owasp.org/Top10/A06_2021-Vulnerable_and_Outdated_Components/
- Framing Software Component Transparency: Establishing a Common Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) https://www.ntia.gov/files/ntia/publications/ntia_sbom_framing_2nd_edition_20211021.pdf
- The Cases for Using the SBOMs We Build https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/AC_SBOM_IB_v2-002.pdf
- OWASP Dependency-Check https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/
- ICS Alert (ICS-ALERT-20-063-01): SweynTooth Vulnerabilities https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/ics-alerts/ics-alert-20-063-01
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.