CWE-495 Variante Brouillon

Private Data Structure Returned From A Public Method

This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and…

Définition

What is CWE-495?

This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and modify the data unexpectedly, corrupting the application's state.
This flaw breaks a core principle of encapsulation in object-oriented design. The private data structure—like an array, collection, or object—is meant to be managed solely by the class's own methods. By handing out a direct reference, you allow external code to add, remove, or alter elements without validation, leading to data corruption, security bypasses, or crashes that are difficult to debug. The fix is to return either a copy of the data (defensive copying) or an immutable view, ensuring the internal state remains protected. Identifying every instance of this pattern across a large codebase can be tedious. While SAST tools can flag the risky return statements, Plexicus uses AI to analyze the context and automatically suggest the correct remediation—such as implementing `Collections.unmodifiableList()` in Java or a slice copy in Go—saving developers hours of manual refactoring and ensuring consistent fixes.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-495

Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.

  2. 2

    Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.

  3. 3

    Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.

  4. 4

    Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Java

Here, a public method in a Java class returns a reference to a private array. Given that arrays in Java are mutable, any modifications made to the returned reference would be reflected in the original private array.

Vulnérable Java
private String[] colors;
  public String[] getColors() {
  	return colors;
  }
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-495

  • Implementation Declare the method private.
  • Implementation Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
  • Implementation Use public setter methods that govern how a private member can be modified.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-495

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-495 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-495 ?

This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and modify the data unexpectedly, corrupting the application's state.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-495 ?

MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-495 ?

MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++, Java, C#.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-495 ?

Declare the method private. Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-495 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-495 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-495 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-495

CWE-664 Parent

Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…

CWE-118 Frère

Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…

CWE-1229 Frère

Creation of Emergent Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…

CWE-1250 Frère

Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State

This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…

CWE-1329 Frère

Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable

This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.

CWE-221 Frère

Information Loss or Omission

This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…

CWE-372 Frère

Incomplete Internal State Distinction

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…

CWE-400 Frère

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…

CWE-404 Frère

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.