Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)
Private Data Structure Returned From A Public Method
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and…
What is CWE-495?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-495
Aucune référence CVE publique n'est liée à ce CWE dans le catalogue MITRE pour le moment.
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.
- 2
Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.
- 3
Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.
- 4
Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.
Vulnerable Java
Here, a public method in a Java class returns a reference to a private array. Given that arrays in Java are mutable, any modifications made to the returned reference would be reflected in the original private array.
private String[] colors;
public String[] getColors() {
return colors;
} Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-495
- Implementation Declare the method private.
- Implementation Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
- Implementation Use public setter methods that govern how a private member can be modified.
How to detect CWE-495
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-495 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-495 ?
This vulnerability occurs when a public method directly returns a reference to a private, internal data structure. Because the reference is live, external callers can bypass intended controls and modify the data unexpectedly, corrupting the application's state.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-495 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-495 ?
MITRE lists the following affected platforms: C, C++, Java, C#.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-495 ?
Declare the method private. Clone the member data and keep an unmodified version of the data private to the object.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-495 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-495 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-495 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-495
Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…
Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')
This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…
Creation of Emergent Resource
This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…
Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State
This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…
Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable
This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.
Information Loss or Omission
This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…
Incomplete Internal State Distinction
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…
Improper Resource Shutdown or Release
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…
Further reading
- MITRE — CWE-495 officiel https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/495.html
- Seven Pernicious Kingdoms: A Taxonomy of Software Security Errors https://samate.nist.gov/SSATTM_Content/papers/Seven%20Pernicious%20Kingdoms%20-%20Taxonomy%20of%20Sw%20Security%20Errors%20-%20Tsipenyuk%20-%20Chess%20-%20McGraw.pdf
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.