CWE-617 Base Brouillon

Reachable Assertion

A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This…

Définition

What is CWE-617?

A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This turns a helpful development tool into a denial-of-service vulnerability.
Assertions are meant to catch logic errors during development, but if left in production code, they can be weaponized. An attacker who discovers the trigger condition can force the application to exit abruptly, disrupting service for all users. For instance, a single triggered assert() in a multi-connection server could terminate every active connection, causing widespread outage. While SAST tools can flag the presence of assertions, managing this risk at scale across a large codebase is challenging. An ASPM platform like Plexicus helps by continuously tracking these flaws in production, and its AI can recommend specific fixes—such as replacing the assert with proper error handling—saving significant manual remediation time.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-617

  • CVE-2023-49286

    Chain: function in web caching proxy does not correctly check a return value (CWE-253) leading to a reachable assertion (CWE-617)

  • CVE-2006-6767

    FTP server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon abort) via crafted commands which trigger an assertion failure.

  • CVE-2006-6811

    Chat client allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long message string when connecting to a server, which causes an assertion failure.

  • CVE-2006-5779

    Product allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via LDAP BIND requests with long authcid names, which triggers an assertion failure.

  • CVE-2006-4095

    Product allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain queries, which cause an assertion failure.

  • CVE-2006-4574

    Chain: security monitoring product has an off-by-one error that leads to unexpected length values, triggering an assertion.

  • CVE-2004-0270

    Anti-virus product has assert error when line length is non-numeric.

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    Identifier un chemin de code qui traite des entrées non fiables sans validation.

  2. 2

    Élaborer une charge utile qui exploite le comportement non sécurisé — injection, traversal, débordement ou abus de logique.

  3. 3

    Délivrer la charge utile via une requête normale et observer la réaction de l'application.

  4. 4

    Itérer jusqu'à ce que la réponse divulgue des données, exécute le code de l'attaquant ou élève les privilèges.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable Java

In the excerpt below, an AssertionError (an unchecked exception) is thrown if the user hasn't entered an email address in an HTML form.

Vulnérable Java 
String email = request.getParameter("email_address");
  assert email != null;
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo 
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-617

  • Implementation Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources)
  • Implementation Perform input validation on user data.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-617

Automated Static Analysis High

Automated static analysis, commonly referred to as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), can find some instances of this weakness by analyzing source code (or binary/compiled code) without having to execute it. Typically, this is done by building a model of data flow and control flow, then searching for potentially-vulnerable patterns that connect "sources" (origins of input) with "sinks" (destinations where the data interacts with external components, a lower layer such as the OS, etc.)

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-617 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Obtenir une démo Essayer Plexicus gratuitement
Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-617 ?

A reachable assertion occurs when an attacker can trigger an assert() statement or similar debugging check, causing the application to crash or behave in a more disruptive way than intended. This turns a helpful development tool into a denial-of-service vulnerability.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-617 ?

MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-617 ?

MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-617 ?

Make sensitive open/close operation non reachable by directly user-controlled data (e.g. open/close resources) Perform input validation on user data.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-617 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-617 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-617 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/617.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-617

CWE-670 Parent

Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation

This weakness occurs when a section of code is structured in a way that always executes incorrectly, regardless of input or conditions.…

CWE-480 Frère

Use of Incorrect Operator

This vulnerability occurs when a developer mistakenly uses the wrong operator in their code, leading to unintended and potentially…

CWE-483 Frère

Incorrect Block Delimitation

This vulnerability occurs when a developer fails to use explicit braces or delimiters to group multiple statements within a block, leading…

CWE-484 Frère

Omitted Break Statement in Switch

This vulnerability occurs when a developer forgets to include a 'break' statement inside a switch-case block. Without it, the code…

CWE-698 Frère

Execution After Redirect (EAR)

Execution After Redirect (EAR) occurs when a web application sends a redirect response to a user's browser but continues to run…

CWE-783 Frère

Operator Precedence Logic Error

This vulnerability occurs when a developer writes a conditional expression where the intended logic is broken due to misunderstanding or…

Ressources

Further reading

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.

Commencer gratuitement Réserver une démo