CWE-666 Classe Brouillon

Operation on Resource in Wrong Phase of Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when software interacts with a resource—like memory, a file, or a network connection—at an incorrect stage of its existence, leading to crashes, data corruption, or…

Définition

What is CWE-666?

This vulnerability occurs when software interacts with a resource—like memory, a file, or a network connection—at an incorrect stage of its existence, leading to crashes, data corruption, or unpredictable behavior.
Every resource in a program has a distinct lifecycle: it's created (initialized), used for its intended purpose, and finally cleaned up (released). Each of these phases has specific rules. A common mistake is trying to use a resource before it's fully ready—like reading from an uninitialized memory buffer—or after it's been disposed of, such as closing an already-closed file handle. These operations violate the expected sequence and directly cause instability. To prevent this, developers must explicitly manage state. Ensure initialization is complete before use, validate the resource is in an 'active' state for operations, and avoid repeated or premature release. Using design patterns like RAII (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization) or implementing clear state flags can enforce the correct order and make invalid phase transitions obvious bugs during development.
Impact réel

Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-666

  • Chain: Signal handler contains too much functionality (CWE-828), introducing a race condition (CWE-362) that leads to a double free (CWE-415).

Comment les attaquants l'exploitent

Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape

  1. 1

    The following code shows a simple example of a double free vulnerability.

  2. 2

    Double free vulnerabilities have two common (and sometimes overlapping) causes:

  3. 3

    - Error conditions and other exceptional circumstances - Confusion over which part of the program is responsible for freeing the memory

  4. 4

    Although some double free vulnerabilities are not much more complicated than this example, most are spread out across hundreds of lines of code or even different files. Programmers seem particularly susceptible to freeing global variables more than once.

Exemple de code vulnérable

Vulnerable C

The following code shows a simple example of a double free vulnerability.

Vulnérable C
char* ptr = (char*)malloc (SIZE);
   ...
   if (abrt) { 
  	 free(ptr); 
   }
   ...
   free(ptr);
Exemple de code sécurisé

Secure pseudo

Sécurisé pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
  const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
  return executeWithGuards(safe);
}
What changed: the unsafe sink is replaced (or the input is validated/escaped) so the same payload no longer triggers the weakness.
Liste de contrôle de prévention

How to prevent CWE-666

  • Architecture and Design Follow the resource's lifecycle from creation to release.
Signaux de détection

How to detect CWE-666

SAST High

Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.

DAST Moderate

Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.

Runtime Moderate

Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.

Code review Moderate

Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.

Correction automatique Plexicus

Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-666 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.

Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.

Questions fréquentes

Frequently asked questions

Qu'est-ce que CWE-666 ?

This vulnerability occurs when software interacts with a resource—like memory, a file, or a network connection—at an incorrect stage of its existence, leading to crashes, data corruption, or unpredictable behavior.

Quelle est la gravité de CWE-666 ?

MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.

Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-666 ?

MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.

Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-666 ?

Follow the resource's lifecycle from creation to release.

Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-666 ?

Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-666 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.

Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-666 ?

MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/666.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.

Faiblesses associées

Weaknesses related to CWE-666

CWE-664 Parent

Improper Control of a Resource Through its Lifetime

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly manage a resource throughout its entire lifecycle—from creation and active use…

CWE-118 Frère

Incorrect Access of Indexable Resource ('Range Error')

This vulnerability occurs when software fails to properly check the boundaries of an indexed resource, like an array, buffer, or file,…

CWE-1229 Frère

Creation of Emergent Resource

This vulnerability occurs when a system's normal operations unintentionally create new, exploitable resources that attackers can use to…

CWE-1250 Frère

Improper Preservation of Consistency Between Independent Representations of Shared State

This vulnerability occurs when a system with multiple independent components (like distributed services or separate hardware units) each…

CWE-1329 Frère

Reliance on Component That is Not Updateable

This vulnerability occurs when a product depends on a component that cannot be updated or patched to fix security flaws or critical bugs.

CWE-221 Frère

Information Loss or Omission

This weakness occurs when an application fails to log critical security events or records them inaccurately, which can misguide security…

CWE-372 Frère

Incomplete Internal State Distinction

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to accurately track its own operational state. The system incorrectly assumes it's in…

CWE-400 Frère

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

This vulnerability occurs when an application fails to properly manage a finite resource, allowing an attacker to exhaust it and cause a…

CWE-404 Frère

Improper Resource Shutdown or Release

This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to properly close or release a system resource—like a file handle, database connection, or…

Prêt quand vous l'êtes

Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.

Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.