Exécuter une analyse statique (SAST) sur le code source à la recherche du motif non sécurisé dans le flux de données.
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation
This weakness occurs when a section of code is structured in a way that always executes incorrectly, regardless of input or conditions. The control flow logic is fundamentally flawed and does not…
What is CWE-670?
Real-world CVEs caused by CWE-670
-
virtual interrupt controller in a virtualization product allows crash of host by writing a certain invalid value to a register, which triggers a fatal error instead of returning an error code
Parcours de l'attaquant étape par étape
- 1
This code queries a server and displays its status when a request comes from an authorized IP address.
- 2
This code redirects unauthorized users, but continues to execute code after calling http_redirect(). This means even unauthorized users may be able to access the contents of the page or perform a DoS attack on the server being queried. Also, note that this code is vulnerable to an IP address spoofing attack (CWE-212).
- 3
In this example, the programmer has indented the statements to call Do_X() and Do_Y(), as if the intention is that these functions are only called when the condition is true. However, because there are no braces to signify the block, Do_Y() will always be executed, even if the condition is false.
- 4
This might not be what the programmer intended. When the condition is critical for security, such as in making a security decision or detecting a critical error, this may produce a vulnerability.
- 5
In both of these examples, a message is printed based on the month passed into the function:
Vulnerable PHP
This code queries a server and displays its status when a request comes from an authorized IP address.
$requestingIP = $_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR'];
if(!in_array($requestingIP,$ipAllowList)){
echo "You are not authorized to view this page";
http_redirect($errorPageURL);
}
$status = getServerStatus();
echo $status;
```
...* Secure pseudo
// Validate, sanitize, or use a safe API before reaching the sink.
function handleRequest(input) {
const safe = validateAndEscape(input);
return executeWithGuards(safe);
} How to prevent CWE-670
- Architecture Use safe-by-default frameworks and APIs that prevent the unsafe pattern from being expressible.
- Implementation Validate input at trust boundaries; use allowlists, not denylists.
- Implementation Apply the principle of least privilege to credentials, file paths, and runtime permissions.
- Testing Cover this weakness in CI: SAST rules + targeted unit tests for the data flow.
- Operation Monitor logs for the runtime signals listed in the next section.
How to detect CWE-670
Exécuter des tests de sécurité applicative dynamique (DAST) contre le point de terminaison en ligne.
Surveiller les journaux runtime pour détecter des traces d'exception inhabituelles, des entrées malformées ou des tentatives de contournement d'autorisation.
Revue de code : signaler tout nouveau code qui traite les entrées de cette surface sans utiliser les helpers du framework validés.
Plexicus détecte automatiquement CWE-670 et ouvre une PR de correction en moins de 60 secondes.
Codex Remedium analyse chaque commit, identifie cette faiblesse précise et livre une pull request prête à être relue avec le correctif. Pas de tickets. Pas de transferts.
Frequently asked questions
Qu'est-ce que CWE-670 ?
This weakness occurs when a section of code is structured in a way that always executes incorrectly, regardless of input or conditions. The control flow logic is fundamentally flawed and does not match the intended algorithm.
Quelle est la gravité de CWE-670 ?
MITRE n'a pas publié de note de probabilité d'exploitation pour cette faiblesse. Traitez-la comme un impact moyen jusqu'à ce que votre modèle de menace prouve le contraire.
Quels langages ou plateformes sont affectés par CWE-670 ?
MITRE n'a pas spécifié les plateformes affectées pour ce CWE — il peut s'appliquer à la plupart des stacks applicatives.
Comment puis-je prévenir CWE-670 ?
Use safe-by-default frameworks, validate untrusted input at trust boundaries, and apply the principle of least privilege. Cover the data-flow signature in CI with SAST.
Comment Plexicus détecte et corrige CWE-670 ?
Le moteur SAST de Plexicus reconnaît la signature de flux de données de CWE-670 à chaque commit. Lorsqu'une correspondance est trouvée, notre agent Codex Remedium ouvre une PR de correction avec le code corrigé, les tests et un résumé d'une ligne pour le relecteur.
Où puis-je en savoir plus sur CWE-670 ?
MITRE publie la définition canonique à https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/670.html. Vous pouvez également consulter la documentation OWASP et NIST pour des conseils adjacents.
Weaknesses related to CWE-670
Insufficient Control Flow Management
This vulnerability occurs when a program's execution flow isn't properly managed, allowing attackers to bypass critical checks, trigger…
Unintended Reentrant Invocation of Non-reentrant Code Via Nested Calls
This vulnerability occurs when a non-reentrant function is called, and during its execution, another call is triggered that unexpectedly…
Sequence of Processor Instructions Leads to Unexpected Behavior
Certain sequences of valid and invalid processor instructions can cause the CPU to lock up or behave unpredictably, often requiring a hard…
Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
A race condition occurs when multiple processes or threads access a shared resource simultaneously without proper coordination, creating a…
Deployment of Wrong Handler
This vulnerability occurs when a system incorrectly assigns or routes an object to the wrong processing component.
Missing Handler
This vulnerability occurs when a software component lacks the necessary code to properly handle an error or unexpected event.
Improper Synchronization
This vulnerability occurs when a multi-threaded or multi-process application allows shared resources to be accessed by multiple threads or…
Incorrect Behavior Order
This weakness occurs when a system executes multiple dependent actions in the wrong sequence, leading to unexpected and potentially…
Incorrect Control Flow Scoping
This vulnerability occurs when a program fails to return execution to the correct point in the code after finishing a specific operation…
Arrêtez de payer par développeur.
Commencez à fermer la boucle.
Plexicus est l'ASPM natif IA qui scanne, filtre, corrige, penteste et explique — de façon autonome. Développeurs illimités, dépôts illimités, actions IA à usage équitable. Vrai niveau gratuit, €269/mo annuel quand vous êtes prêt.